Re: [Callers] Leading, consent in embellishments

2018-03-11 Thread Read Weaver via Callers
I don’t see the advantage of using the terms lead & follow here, and I do see disadvantages. There are dance styles that have true leading and following (most ballroom, swing, etc.), and some new-to-contra people already know those true-leading/following dance styles, and will know that the

Re: [Callers] Leading, consent in embellishments

2018-03-11 Thread Angela DeCarlis via Callers
Hello Jeanette! So excited about this topic. I help run a genderfree dance in Boston, and love what happens to a community with genderfree terminology*. Firstly, I agree with everything Maia has already said, particularly their point about finding it confusing if there isn't a clearly delegated

Re: [Callers] Leading, consent in embellishments

2018-03-11 Thread Maia McCormick via Callers
Hi Jeanette, Exciting workshop! I'm glad to see this discussed! So if I'm understanding you correctly, you seem to be contrasting the idea of a "leader" with the fact that moves must be "executed with mutual consent", which I find interesting. For me, those ideas are not at all at odds. I see