[Callers] Contra Friendly Squares

2016-10-20 Thread Tony Parkes via Callers
Tom Hinds wrote: > There are many reasons some contra dancers don't like squares. One > is that they take a long time to teach. _Some_ squares take a long time to teach with any group, because they're complex even by square dance standards. Other squares take longer to teach to contra dancers

Re: [Callers] Contra Friendly Squares -- people left over.

2016-10-18 Thread Keith Wood via Callers
Here's a couple of 5-couple dances in Levi Jackson formation: http://dancekaleidoscope.org.au/dance.html#Rubigold http://dancekaleidoscope.org.au/dance.html#Sundowner Click the Call Sheet button to see and print the instructions. Cheers Keith Wood Over the past several years, we have had

[Callers] Contra Friendly Squares -- people left over.

2016-10-17 Thread Richard Hopkins via Callers
Over the past several years, we have had several ‘extra’ dances here in Tallahassee that are advertised to the contra dance listserv and elsewhere as old-time or square dances, or old time square dances, with live music. We have had anywhere from 8 to 30 dancers come. One of the things we

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Martha Wild via Callers
I don’t dislike squares. But I hesitate to call them unless there are only four or maybe 8 couples left at the end of the dance for a number of reasons - one being the large teaching to dancing ratio in general as mentioned below, another being the fact that you can have two - seven people who

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Hinds via Callers
There are many reasons some contra dancers don't like squares. One is that they take a long time to teach. For some squares it's a good idea to walk through the figure for both the heads and sides. Depending on the caller and dancers a full length break may be taught as well. When I

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Hinds via Callers
Erik, I really like the break and figure you sent! Is the promenade in the figure about 3/4 of the way around? When you say it's "not the easiest in the world" do you think it's better for an all experienced crowd? Tom

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-17 Thread Erik Hoffman via Callers
Though Banjos in Love, For Maxine & Brendan does fit the quality of "Contra-like", it's not the easiest dance in the world. But it does have its own intro/break: Banjos in Love, for Maxine and Brendan Quadrille Intro, Break, End A1 Head women chain right; Same four half hey A2

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-16 Thread John Sweeney via Callers
Hi Ron, Here are some figures that might fit your needs. But you also need some breaks/choruses that contra dancers will find easy; you don’t have to use ones shown with the figures. Chippenham Square by Colin Hume http://colinhume.com/insts.htm#ChippenhamSquare Geezy Peezy by Larry

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-14 Thread Robert Livingston via Callers
can keep picking up the phrasing. Bob LivingstonMiddletown, CT From: Ron Blechner via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> To: Caller's discussion list <call...@sharedweight.net> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:51 AM Subject: [Callers] Contra friendly squares Hi all,

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-14 Thread Sue C. Hulsether via Callers
Here’s one I love for the contra dancers: Pete’s Square Tom Hinds A1: H's lead to cpl on R; Circle L 1/2 to line of 4 (at sides); 8 go F and B A2: R and L thru with cpl across (1 with 4, 2 w/ 3) Sw opp dancer; end sw facing pt (keep hand on back, stand side by side)

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-14 Thread Linda Leslie via Callers
Hi, Ron, Here are some favorites of mine. I hope a few might be the type of square you would like. Have fun! warmly, Linda On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares

Re: [Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-14 Thread Richard Fischer via Callers
I like The Compost Pile Breakdown by Gene Hubert. (You can find it online.) Richard On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares in my box. > > 1. Keepers preferred unless it's a really good mixer. > 2.

[Callers] Contra friendly squares

2016-10-14 Thread Ron Blechner via Callers
Hi all, I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares in my box. 1. Keepers preferred unless it's a really good mixer. 2. Not too gimmicky. 3. Not really interested currently in Southern style visiting couple squares (heads and sides fine, but not one couple at a time). (Got