Tom Hinds wrote:
> There are many reasons some contra dancers don't like squares. One
> is that they take a long time to teach.
_Some_ squares take a long time to teach with any group, because they're
complex even by square dance standards. Other squares take longer to teach to
contra dancers
Here's a couple of 5-couple dances in Levi Jackson formation:
http://dancekaleidoscope.org.au/dance.html#Rubigold
http://dancekaleidoscope.org.au/dance.html#Sundowner
Click the Call Sheet button to see and print the instructions.
Cheers
Keith Wood
Over the past several years, we have had
Over the past several years, we have had several ‘extra’ dances here in
Tallahassee that are advertised to the contra dance listserv and elsewhere as
old-time or square dances, or old time square dances, with live music. We have
had anywhere from 8 to 30 dancers come. One of the things we
I don’t dislike squares. But I hesitate to call them unless there are only four
or maybe 8 couples left at the end of the dance for a number of reasons - one
being the large teaching to dancing ratio in general as mentioned below,
another being the fact that you can have two - seven people who
There are many reasons some contra dancers don't like squares. One
is that they take a long time to teach. For some squares it's a good
idea to walk through the figure for both the heads and sides.
Depending on the caller and dancers a full length break may be taught
as well.
When I
Erik,
I really like the break and figure you sent! Is the promenade in the
figure about 3/4 of the way around?
When you say it's "not the easiest in the world" do you think it's
better for an all experienced crowd?
Tom
Though Banjos in Love, For Maxine & Brendan does fit the quality of
"Contra-like", it's not the easiest dance in the world. But it does have its
own intro/break:
Banjos in Love, for Maxine and Brendan Quadrille
Intro, Break, End
A1 Head women chain right;
Same four half hey
A2
Hi Ron,
Here are some figures that might fit your needs. But you also need
some breaks/choruses that contra dancers will find easy; you dont have to
use ones shown with the figures.
Chippenham Square by Colin Hume
http://colinhume.com/insts.htm#ChippenhamSquare
Geezy Peezy by Larry
can keep picking up the
phrasing.
Bob LivingstonMiddletown, CT
From: Ron Blechner via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net>
To: Caller's discussion list <call...@sharedweight.net>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:51 AM
Subject: [Callers] Contra friendly squares
Hi all,
Here’s one I love for the contra dancers:
Pete’s Square
Tom Hinds
A1: H's lead to cpl on R;
Circle L 1/2 to line of 4 (at sides);
8 go F and B
A2: R and L thru with cpl across (1 with 4, 2 w/ 3)
Sw opp dancer; end sw facing pt (keep hand on back, stand side by
side)
Hi, Ron,
Here are some favorites of mine. I hope a few might be the type of square you
would like. Have fun!
warmly, Linda
On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Ron Blechner via Callers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares
I like The Compost Pile Breakdown by Gene Hubert. (You can find it online.)
Richard
On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares in my box.
>
> 1. Keepers preferred unless it's a really good mixer.
> 2.
Hi all,
I'm looking to expand the number of contra-friendly Squares in my box.
1. Keepers preferred unless it's a really good mixer.
2. Not too gimmicky.
3. Not really interested currently in Southern style visiting couple
squares (heads and sides fine, but not one couple at a time).
(Got
13 matches
Mail list logo