I am like you Ron, I simply ignore the posts that are - that I'm not interested
in. And I suggest others do the same.
Eventually that thread will become a dialogue between one or two others and
either the list admin can opt them out or they'll go on sparring forever more.
Laurie p
Sent from
As a couple of you have kindly pointed out, I unintentionally
sent my last message to the entire list. Ooops. I hop I didn't
say anything that will get me too much flak.
As most of you know, in order to avoid bad interactions with
anti-spoofing policies of so service providers, including AOL
Seth,
I'm writing this just to you (and to Neal, for reasons that you'll
see) and not to the whole list. I see myself as someone whose mind
might be changed. For example, if an alternative term for "gypsy"
became common in places where I dance and call--say, common enough
that you could use it
Ron,
I am carefully not policing what discussions are allowed. I’m simply asking
people to ask themselves if the conversation has gone far enough. Is what they
are going to say really going to further the conversation? I was pretty
careful not to police.
However, I agree about hitting the
When I find topics in shared weight that I don't care to participate in, I
ignore them.
Please don't police what we are allowed to discuss or not discuss.
On Jan 22, 2016 1:01 PM, "Michael Fuerst via Callers" <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> During a contra dance, the eighth beat of
During a contra dance, the eighth beat of music indicates to the participants
when to exit from the circular gypsy figure. The ongoing discussion lacks such
luxury Michael Fuerst 802 N Broadway Urbana IL 61801 217 239
5844
On Friday, January 22, 2016 11:50 AM, Seth Seeger
Dear callers,
Perhaps it is time to ask yourself, “has this gypsy discussion run its course?”
Are any more replies truly adding to the conversation? I imagine that at this
point, no one’s mind is going to be changed…
Thank you for considering!
Seth
https://xkcd.com/386/
