---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104708/#review12859
---
First of all: I like this initiative very much. I have some
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/#review12860
---
I know we are being a bit pedantic about the coding style, but
It looks like subversion is the popular destination for these files,
certainly there is the chance for an overly large version to be
accidentally commited as well. Between that and git sending history
information, SVN seems to be the way to go.
calligratests already has a number of existing
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 11:19:22 Stuart Dickson wrote:
It looks like subversion is the popular destination for these files,
certainly there is the chance for an overly large version to be
accidentally commited as well. Between that and git sending history
information, SVN seems to be the way
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:43:33 +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek stan...@kde.org
wrote:
Regarding the future, after looking at the statistics I am considering
dropping the k...@kde.org list completely in favour of the forums
(plus option for delivering forum contents via email). The forums are
working
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/#review12862
---
libs/odf/Ko3dScene.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/
---
(Updated April 24, 2012, 1:40 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/
---
(Updated April 24, 2012, 2:57 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:19:22 Stuart Dickson wrote:
It looks like subversion is the popular destination for these files,
certainly there is the chance for an overly large version to be
accidentally commited as well. Between that and git sending history
information, SVN seems to be the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/#review12868
---
Ship it!
I see no further issues
Don't forget to squash the
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 17:01:46 Inge Wallin wrote:
I asked the system administrators to allow for odf files in
community.kde.org. This was because I wanted to add presentations that
people could use to talk about Calligra and not have ot do it all by
themselves. Maybe that could be an
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 20:01:48 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
Don't fill that just yet :)
Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who
want to make it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104688/#review12886
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Hi Thorsten,
Am Samstag, 21. April 2012, 06:42:28 schrieb Thorsten Zachmann:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 13:48:52 you wrote:
Hi,
so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
putting them on the table for the plugfest as well as for the TC call :)
A)
Hi Jos,
thanks a lot for picking that list up as much as possible!
Am Freitag, 20. April 2012, 12:03:01 schrieb Jos van den Oever:
On Thursday 19 April 2012 13:48:52 PM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
putting them on
Bruce Byfield has written a very friendly article about Calligra in the Linux
Pro magazine. It contains such gems as:
You might think of dockers as Calligra’s equivalent of MS Office’s ribbon
interface, except more complex and better organized.
The new Braindump is another strong office
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 20:01:48 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
Don't fill that just yet :)
Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who
want to make it
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 23:57:54 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Yes, e.g. the above OFFICE-3750 is for me. But there has never been any
reply to an email saying
Thanks for your input, please track how we deal with the issue at
Hello,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 23:57:54 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
I also tried to get it with the viewBox but failed (was a few weeks ago).
Rereading the sentence The geometry is horizontally centered. in
16.40.8 draw:marker left me thinking that the spec indeed does not
demand that
Hello,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 23:57:54 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
a) Translation of the marker type names
At least LO/AOO label the default marker types. And IMHO that make sense,
as indeed you might want to talk about a marker type by name.
unfortunately this happens quite often in
20 matches
Mail list logo
