Hi,
I fear some of my UI-related commits have ignored the concept of the
SpecialSpacer system, as I simply removed that extra widget because it looked
like garbage to me and did not result in any visual or functional difference
for what I tested (and reviewers have missed this as well :) ).
Am Samstag, 7. April 2012, 15:10:02 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 07 April 2012 14:56:01 you wrote:
Hi,
I fear some of my UI-related commits have ignored the concept of the
SpecialSpacer system, as I simply removed that extra widget because it
looked like garbage to me and did not result
On Saturday 07 April 2012 15:28:20 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Samstag, 7. April 2012, 15:10:02 schrieben Sie:
On Saturday 07 April 2012 14:56:01 you wrote:
Hi,
I fear some of my UI-related commits have ignored the concept of the
SpecialSpacer system, as I simply removed
So currently all optionwidgets need to add a SpecialSpacer to signal that
there is no UI gain in letting them stretch if put together with others.
I wonder if this system could perhaps be reversed.
E.g. by that all those optionwidgets which gain from being stretched have a
QObject property set
On Saturday 07 April 2012 16:00:01 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
So currently all optionwidgets need to add a SpecialSpacer to signal that
there is no UI gain in letting them stretch if put together with others.
I wonder if this system could perhaps be reversed.
E.g. by that all those
