VOICE OF AMERICA  

_VOA  Home_ (http://www.voanews.com/english/portal.cfm)   _Khmer  Home _ 
(http://www.voanews.com/khmer/index.cfm)   _Regions/Topics_ 
(http://www.voanews.com/khmer/categories.cfm)   _Subscribe to  E-mail_ 
(http://www.voanews.com/khmer/email-subscription.cfm)   _Select  Language_ 
(http://www.voanews.com/english/screen_map.cfm)   _About  VOA_ 
(http://www.voanews.com/english/about/index.cfm)   
 
    Many Factors  Availed CPP Sweep: Monitors  By Pin Sisovann, VOA Khmer  
Original report from Phnom Penh
01 September 2008

 The ruling Cambodian People's Party had among other  assets a broad 
political organization to 
help its big win in July,  election monitors say.The ruling Cambodian 
People's  Party did even better than its own predictions in July's election, 
and 
monitors  said in recent interviews it had done so by exploiting the election 
process and  a position of advantage rather than an outright theft of votes. 
The CPP dominated the polls in July, winning 90 of 123 National Assembly  
seats, more than enough to enact legislation, quorum and amend the 
constitution.  
The opposition Sam Rainsy and Human Rights parties have accused CPP of  
stealing votes, but two top monitors said last week that the CPP was able to  
earn 
a high number of seats through myriad factors much more complicated. 
These included loopholes in the election law, the deletion of voter names  
from registries, the abuse of administrative forms, widespread use of state  
assets and local authorities and the help of broadcast media, according to Koul 
 
Panha, executive director of the Committee for Free and Fair Elections, and 
Hang  Puthea, executive director of the Neutral and Impartial Committee for 
Free 
and  Fair Elections in Cambodia. 
Koul Panha pointed out that the election law didn't stipulate a budget limit  
for campaigning, giving the CPP another advantage. 
"A lot of upper-hand factors" have not been investigated, he said, "such as  
money and materials, giving out money to voters, support from local officials  
who knew which groups of people would vote for what party, messy voter lists 
and  irregularities." 
"The loopholes in the law and management of the election did not guarantee a  
fair election," he added. 
The CPP also leveraged other advantages, such as a widespread political  
organization, the construction of infrastructure and a pre-election row with  
Thailand over Preah Vihear temple, both monitors said. Broadcasts on television 
 
and radio amplified these factors, they said. 
"The CPP used the media to propagate its achievements and attract voters,"  
Koul Panha said.  
Commune and village chiefs were also a decisive factor this year, Hang Puthea 
 said. 
These authorities were able to exercise pressure on voters through a local  
ballot count, a new procedure this year that allowed them to identify 
opposition  supporters, Hang Puthea said. 
Local officials were able to instill bias by warning voters that the CPP  
would need to win in order for a community to have peace and security, he  
said. 
Though many of the winning factors did not meet international standards for a 
 fair and free election, both monitors said, the CPP also had legitimate 
reasons  for winning seats.  
These included economic achievements of the party, its grassroots political  
networks, powerful officials that solved some crises ahead of the election, 
and  the party's ability to lure supporters away from its rivals. 
National Election Committee Chairman Im Suosdey denied the CPP had unfair  
advantages in the election.  
NEC officials followed election law without giving advantages to the CPP, he  
said, including in the recruitment of officials, the ballot count and 
throughout  the complaints procedure. 
Critics argue the NEC is dominated by a majority of CPP-appointed officials,  
and opposition leader Sam Rainsy said during hearings last week the  
Constitutional Council, which arbitrates appeals beyond the NEC, followed the  
CPP 
line as well. 
"I don't think the election made any party gain the upper-hand over other  
parties," Im Sousdey said. "You claimed alleged upper-hand factors only after  
the election results had come out. It is not true. The NEC only abides by the  
law and doesn't want to give anyone the upper-hand." 
Amendments to the election law will have to be done democratically, through  
legislation passed by the National Assembly, he said, and not through  
"groundless allegations" made by the losers of an election. 
SRP lawmaker Son Chhay, however, said a biased NEC colluded with the ruling  
party to help it win, by allowing the use of state property and media in the  
election and not enacting a election finance law. 
"The NEC is not independent," Son Chhay said. "It was created to help steal  
votes for the CPP. There is no neutral institution to file complaints with 
about  the theft of votes. Going to the NEC, it is a puppet of the CPP. Going 
to  
Constitutional Council, it is the ruling party's puppet." 
CPP lawmaker Chiem Yeap, who is also a member of the CPP's central committee, 
 said the party had won its 90 seats legitimately. 
Voters showed their gratitude to a party that liberated them from the Khmer  
Rouge, built peace, rebuilt the nation and its infrastructure and reduced  
poverty, he said.  
"Let me ask you, where can a vote be stolen?" Chiem Yeap said. "The Sam  
Rainsy Party had agents who signed the proper electoral process report and 
party  
agents of all parties signed this to accept the election results." 
The 90-seat win was a surprise, he said, but signaled a trend that could go  
on in the next commune elections and beyond. The party was looking for 84 or 
85  seats this year, but it could win as many as 100 seats in the next general  
election, he said.
"As soon as I heard the NEC announcement of the unofficial result," he said,  
"tears of emotion came out of my eyes."

 






**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to camdisc@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to