Alexey Rodriguez wrote:
Dear all,
We are experiencing crashes in Caml-calling C code. This happens if
garbage collection runs after Caml code has raised an exception. We now
understand why this happens but we are puzzled as to why the Interfacing
C with Ocaml chapter of the Ocaml manual
Romain Bardou wrote:
Le 30/03/2012 16:15, Jonathan Protzenko a écrit :
Hi again,
Following all the good suggestions in this thread, I've updated the
installer. It now downloads and runs cygwin's setup.exe so as to
provide a fully working environment for OCaml on windows after the
Hongbo Zhang wrote:
Hi List,
I want to implement sliding window algorithm (in place, no memory
copy), I wonder whether I need to write c code.
To make it clear and simple,
In c, you can record the head pointer of the array, and do the
modulo operations when get and set
Wojciech Meyer wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the installer!
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Protzenko
jonathan.protze...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, ocamlbuild requires a unix-like environment, with a few
utilities in the path: bash, mkdir...
It looks like he's got a
Dario Teixeira wrote:
Hi,
Basically I like the idea of teaching users this way. The typical
user
will understand the impact, and act accordingly. Nevertheless, I would
like it if it would be made as easy as possible to provide good seeds
if required. The Random module is definitely
Gabriel Scherer wrote:
In the process of discussing bug #5312, the caml team would like to know
if people still have use of the @responsefile feature under windows. If
not, it could be removed from the runtime -- that is from all OCaml
programs.
Francois Berenger wrote:
On 02/26/2012 07:49 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
I've comparatively recently upgraded from an embarrassingly old
version of Fedora to CentOS 6.2. With only the default repositories
enabled, the version of OCaml and number of packages available are a
bit limited
I've comparatively recently upgraded from an embarrassingly old version of
Fedora to CentOS 6.2. With only the default repositories enabled, the
version of OCaml and number of packages available are a bit limited
(especially compared with Fedora).
Before I go ahead and just build what I want from
I'm in the process of eliminating any customisations I might have in place,
but do any other Windows users get the following unexpected result with
Unix.open_connection running MinGW-w64 OCaml 3.12.1?
# let (i, o) = Unix.open_connection (Unix.ADDR_INET
(Unix.inet_addr_of_string 173.194.67.104,
Romain Bardou wrote:
Hi list,
There has been some discussion during the last few months were some
argued that there was not enough Windows users to test libraries. Well it
happens that I need to compile Cryptokit for Windows. Here are my first
results, which failed miserably. I'm using
Valentin ROBERT wrote:
I guess you can write it like:
let a = (if out then [o] else []) @ (if value then [v] else [])
But it's not particularly more pleasant to the eye.
Still it reduces the exponential explosion of the code, at a small additional
cost (the @), I believe.
Actually, it's
Edgar Friendly wrote:
On 01/20/2012 03:37 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Actually, it's possible that with more cases it might be faster - it's
eliminating the allocation (at some point) of all the tuples needed
for the match case,
Doesn't the ocaml compiler not allocate the unnecessary tuples
ivan chollet wrote:
Sorry Richard I should have elaborated a bit more.
I guess there are a couple of examples in the literature, but one
of them comes to my mind, consider the following code snippet:
let fd = Unix.open myfile1 ... in
let fd = Unix.open myfile2 ... in
... (some code)
Yaron Minsky wrote:
For just this reason, the hashtables in Core have been reimplemented to use an
AVL tree in the buckets. That way, even when you have pathological
collisions,
you degrade gracefully to O(log n) per operation, instead of O(n), where n is
the number of keys in the
Philip wrote:
Hi,
i obviously missed something, but where can i download current ocamlbuild
sources?
They're in the main OCaml sources tarball (or SVN, therefore) in the ocamlbuild
directory
David
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
Walter Cazzola wrote:
Hi,
thanks Cedric i got the point, I can separate interface from the
implementation but:
The main point of interfaces is to constrain the inferred interface of a module
(e.g. hide functions or types which shouldn't be exposed to another module or
constraint polymorphic
malc wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Hello,
Can anybody confirm me that the following code works on cygwin :
It won't - Sys.os_type returns Cygwin and getconf isn't in Cygwin either -
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-12/msg00435.html (actually, it may be now - I
haven't
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:04:51AM +0200, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Hello,
Can anybody confirm me that the following code works on cygwin :
let cpu_count () =
try match Sys.os_type with
| Win32 - int_of_string (Sys.getenv NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS)
| _ -
I'm working on a new version of a framework for a server daemon which can
have custom functionality plugged in through different backends. The present
version works by passing a record containing lots of options along the lines
of:
type backend = {b_connect: (connectionID - bool) option;
*)
end
-Cheers
Pierre
Selon David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com:
I'm working on a new version of a framework for a server daemon which
can have custom functionality plugged in through different backends.
The present version works by passing a record containing lots of
options
Adrien Nader wrote:
On 10/08/2011, Matthieu Dubuget matthieu.dubu...@gmail.com wrote:
Date: 10/08/2011 10:25
From: David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com wrote:
Good to know that 64-bit MinGW is working - that said, I thought the
MinGW port was broken in 3.12.1 or is that not affected
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Xavier Leroy wrote:
On 08/08/2011 10:03 AM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Then I do not see anything wrong if the code snippet you sent.
However, when you change Val_int to caml_copy_nativeint, the layout
of the tuple is different. [...] So if you keep the
malc wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, David Allsopp wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Xavier Leroy wrote:
On 08/08/2011 10:03 AM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Then I do not see anything wrong if the code snippet you sent.
However, when you change Val_int to caml_copy_nativeint
OK, some further digging into my problem with ocaml-ssl eventually revealed
that the problem is the way it handles Unix.file_descr. On Unix, this is
just an [int] and so ocaml-ssl's stubs treat it as such. Under Windows, it's
a custom block as file_descr is a C struct containing a lot of
I don't seem to be able to ask Google this in a way which will give me a
reasonable answer!
In the same process, if you have one thread blocked on a [recv] operation on
a socket, under Unix another thread can still write to the socket. Under
Windows, however, the call to [send] blocks because
I just translated that OCaml example to C and it works correctly under Windows
which suggests it's a bug in OCaml... so I'll attach that ML file to a Mantis
report, instead!
David Allsopp wrote:
Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 18:01 +0100 schrieb David Allsopp:
I don't
26 matches
Mail list logo
