On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Alexy Khrabrov wrote:
> Perhaps it should be called opp? Or does c stand for "compatible
> preprocessor for ocaml"? :)
If you want it to be reachable using search engines on the Web (and
gives less importance to acronyms/backronyms) cppo is better than opp.
As
Hello,
I am trying to compile a plugin for ocaml-mysql, in order to use it with the
native version of the ocsigen webserver. I ran into the following problem:
ocamlopt -shared -linkall -o mysql.cmxs mysql.cmxa
usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmysql_stubs
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
File "
Perhaps it should be called opp? Or does c stand for "compatible
preprocessor for ocaml"? :)
A+
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Martin Jambon
wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I would like to announce the release of cppo 0.9.2 which contains a few
> additional features since the last announcement in 200
Hi,
I have to create a simple graphical interface to display big amounts
of data: up to 20 plots with several millions of points each.
I'm using the Archimedes library (hosted on the forge, see the "NB" at
the end for the reason I'm using it). Archimedes can use Cairo2 and
Cairo2 can be used in c
Le mardi 09 août 2011 23:11:23, William Le Ferrand a écrit :
> Dear List,
>
> A couple of weeks ago we "benchmarked" an ocaml event where people would
> gather and share coding tips and techniques while working on a community
> tool for OCaml. We were 3 friends, and we released baoug.org (you have
Hi,
Right, there are issues with some browsers, maybe due to the way eliom
(ocsigen) encodes the dom. We'll dig into that for sure - baoug is also
supposed to be a testing platform for ocsigen.
Cheers
William
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Florent Monnier wrote:
> Le mardi 09 août 2011 23:
2011/8/12 Thomas Braibant :
> Hi,
Hi!
> During my summer vacations, I decided to have fun trying to make an
> OCaml binding for a C library (my first time). My requirements were to
> have an "OCaml feeling" (i.e. to have an OCaml interface that looks
> like the library was written in OCaml), and
On 12/08/2011, David Allsopp wrote:
> Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
>> From: David Allsopp wrote:
>> > Good to know that 64-bit MinGW is working - that said, I thought the
>> MinGW port was broken in 3.12.1 or is that not affected with the 64-bit
>> compiler? Could you share details on how you configur
Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
> From: David Allsopp wrote:
> > Good to know that 64-bit MinGW is working - that said, I thought the
> MinGW port was broken in 3.12.1 or is that not affected with the 64-bit
> compiler? Could you share details on how you configured OCaml?
>
> This is not 64 bits. i686-w6
Adrien Nader wrote:
> On 10/08/2011, Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
> >
> > Date: 10/08/2011 10:25
> > From: David Allsopp wrote:
> >> Good to know that 64-bit MinGW is working - that said, I thought the
> >> MinGW port was broken in 3.12.1 or is that not affected with the
> >> 64-bit compiler? Could yo
Thomas Braibant wrote:
> During my summer vacations, I decided to have fun trying to make an OCaml
> binding for a C library (my first time). My requirements were to have an
> "OCaml feeling" (i.e. to have an OCaml interface that looks like the
> library was written in OCaml)
This is obviously a
Hi,
During my summer vacations, I decided to have fun trying to make an
OCaml binding for a C library (my first time). My requirements were to
have an "OCaml feeling" (i.e. to have an OCaml interface that looks
like the library was written in OCaml), and to have good memory
management (no leaks).
Dear list,
I would like to announce the release of cppo 0.9.2 which contains a few
additional features since the last announcement in 2009.
http://martin.jambon.free.fr/cppo.html
cppo is a lightweight preprocessor analogous to cpp and compatible with
the OCaml syntax. It provides the classic d
13 matches
Mail list logo
