On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:37:26PM +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2011, 15:55 +0100 schrieb oliver:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:14:57PM +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2011, 21:22 +0100 schrieb oliver:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I ag
Apologies for cross-postings.
Kindly email this call for papers to your colleagues, faculty members and
postgraduate students.
CALL FOR PAPERS
**
Ireland International Conference on Education (IICE-2012),
April 16-18, 2012, Dublin, Irel
On 14/12/2011, Alain Frisch wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 04:49 PM, Adrien wrote:
>> But windows actually has symlinks. Kind of. Starting with Vista and the
>> corresponding NTFS version. But by default you need to be an administrator
>> to use them, you can only create a limited number of symlink in a g
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Adrien wrote:
> On 15/12/2011, Martin DeMello wrote:
>>
>> This seems better-maintained:
>>
>> https://github.com/bmatzelle/gow/wiki
>>
>> At the very least it would be a good starting point.
>
> I had never heard of that one before and asked people about it. It
Reply inline
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, ygrek wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500
> Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated
> > testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments. Batteries is
> > definitely benefiting
On 15/12/2011, Martin DeMello wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Adrien wrote:
>> On 14/12/2011, David Allsopp wrote:
>>>
>>> Any particular reason why the GnuWin32 project doesn't already fulfil
>>> this
>>> requirement (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/)?
>>
>> It's not maintained well a
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500
Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated
> testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments. Batteries is
> definitely benefiting from ygrek's jenkins/hudson server[1] (although it
> must have stopped
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:31:07 +0100
"Gerd Stolpmann" wrote:
>
> > I would like to comment on a tangential aspect of the rationale you
> > gave:
> >
> >> Given that OCaml is such a nice language with a lot of useful
> >> frameworks available,
> >> it is too sad to see it loosing ground just because
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Andrej Bauer wrote:
> Recent discussions on how to improve the Ocaml-on-windows situation
> are very welcome, but I see a lot of tech-speak and little feeling for
> the users, who care just about one thing: to have a click & install
> distribution of Ocaml that ac
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Adrien wrote:
> On 14/12/2011, David Allsopp wrote:
>>
>> Any particular reason why the GnuWin32 project doesn't already fulfil this
>> requirement (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/)?
>
> It's not maintained well and it's often quite dirty.
This seems better-main
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2011, 19:41 + schrieb David Allsopp:
> Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2011, 09:27 -0800 schrieb Aleksey Nogin:
> > > On 14.12.2011 04:52, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't think you will be able to convince everybody - at this point
> > > > the
Hi Andrej,
I would gladly welcome any patch for my ocaml-installer that allows one
to build the self-contained environment you describe. Some people seem
to have volunteered to help out; let them be assured that I will gladly
review any patch they send.
I'm just afraid it's a big task to do
On 14/12/2011, Alain Frisch wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 02:37 PM, Adrien wrote:
>> I don't think it would be possible to live without a C toolchain simply
>> because we use C libraries all the time.
>
> It depends on who is "we". I can imagine that library developers still
> need a C toolchain but rele
On 14/12/2011, David Allsopp wrote:
> Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2011, 09:27 -0800 schrieb Aleksey Nogin:
>> > On 14.12.2011 04:52, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
>> >
>> > > I don't think you will be able to convince everybody - at this point
>> > > the issue becomes political in some
On 15/12/2011, Martin DeMello wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Gerd Stolpmann
> wrote:
>>
>> There could be an alternative: The "busybox approach". We could develop
>> a toolkit that covers all the Unix commands we need for the existing
>> build scripts. It would include easy things like
15 matches
Mail list logo