Hi All,
Currently I'm looking for a Java parser. Is there anyone aware of a
decent Java source code parser written in Ocaml?
Thanks in advance,
Sung Kim
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Yes you are right my first answer was totally out of scope,
I will try to make it forgive and forget with this new one :)
Still take it with care while it seems you are far more knowledged than me
to answer to your own question ;-)
> Just an elementary question.
>
> I put 'a in the interface:
> va
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
Changing the Makefile to link against tk84.dll and tcl84.dll seems
to fix
the problem.
Did you manage to do it with *.dll or *.lib? I don't have those
dll's and have been unable to compile the MinGW port with a setup
that succeeded since
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib is commen
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib is commented out.
Changing the Makefile to link against tk84.
Adrien wrote:
How often should we expect new releases of flexlink ? Basically, the
question is : will it have to be updated from time to time or can we
just drop it somewhere and forget everything about it ?
There will be new releases when bugs are found and fixed. It's hard to
predict. I don'
2008/10/16, Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Allsopp wrote:
>> There seems to be an interesting chicken-and-egg source dependency between
>> flexdll and OCaml 3.11 - you can't build OCaml 3.11 from source or use it
>> afterwards without flexdll and you can't build flexdll from source witho
Thanks for your answer; now I'll try to sate my point in a clear way,
since you misunderstood all my questions.
I put 'a in the interface:
val fu : 'a -> 'a
and int in the implementation:
let fu x = x + 1
this interface doesn't reflect the implementation, ocaml will reject it in any
way
OK,
Hi,
> The manual states that implementation files are not handled
> because if you have a .ml and .mli then ocamlbuild will choose
> the .mli.
Thanks for the info. You may want to clarify that on the manual,
because presently the language implies that implementation files
are ignored altogether.
See this post on beginner's list:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/6905
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Harrison, John R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This discussion of dynamic loading in 3.11 reminded me of a more basic
> question I meant to ask, but never did. On ce
David Allsopp wrote:
The install target of flexdll's Makefile suggests copying:
flexdll_initer.c, flexdll.c
Surely these aren't needed once it's compiled?
Indeed. However, some people might want to recompile them (e.g. to keep
debug symbols, or to use a specific version of their C com
Hi all,
Camlp5 5.10 compatible with OCaml from 3.08.0 to 3.11.0 is OK.
Documentation and download at:
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/camlp5/
Thank you.
--
Daniel de Rauglaudre
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription m
I'm slowly testing my stuff on WinXP SP2 and will do Windows Vista SP1 (both
MinGW build).
Very much looking forward to adding plug-in support back into two products
now that native Dynlink is available so many thanks to the OCaml team for
the work on this release!
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports s
Apologies if I missed them, but are there any installation instructions for
flexdll for Win32 building OCaml 3.11? I copied flexdll.h,
flexdll_initer_mingw.o, flexdll_mingw.o and flexlink.exe to my (empty) OCaml
bin directory (C:\Dev\OCaml\bin which is in PATH) before starting to build
which seemed
There is a deep reason for this, the short answer is:
"if you want native-compilation only, then all your .ml files must have a
.mli"
Indeed ocamlbuild only generates .cmi from .ml using ocamlc, this is to avoid
conflicting defaulting rules in the engine.
Are conflicting rules a problem?
Excerpts from romain.bardou's message of Thu Oct 16 10:30:49 +0200 2008:
> > I observe that ocamlbuild does not build cmx cmi and o files from a ml
> > file (which has no associated mli) directly. Do others see different
> > behavior? Instead it builds cmo and cmi from the ml using ocamlc, and
I observe that ocamlbuild does not build cmx cmi and o files from a ml
file (which has no associated mli) directly. Do others see different
behavior? Instead it builds cmo and cmi from the ml using ocamlc, and
then builds the cmx and o files from there using ocamlopt. Is there a
reason I’m m
The Win64 port is listed as requiring Windows XP 64 or Server 64 - is 64 bit
Windows Vista not included in the list because it's not supported or because
it's not been tested with it?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damien Doligez
S
* *
* RTA 2009 *
* Rewriting Techniques and Applications*
* 20th International Conference
19 matches
Mail list logo
