This might be of interest to anyone else in the Boston area.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anne Hunter
Date: Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM
Subject: User Group for functional programmers and scientific
computing; Monday, April 6th
To: jobsl...@altoids.mit.edu
Rick, Michael, and I
Jean Guyader wrote:
Is it possible to generate 32 bits assembly code with a 64 bits ocamlopt?
If you are adventurous, you might be able to set up a cross compilation
environment, look at the PowerPC 405 thread from a few days ago for
ideas.
The easier way is probably to set up a 32 bit chroot
Jean Guyader writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to generate 32 bits assembly code with a 64 bits ocamlopt?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jean Guyader
Afaik no.
MfG
Goswin
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-b
Daniel Bünzli writes:
> Le 3 avr. 09 à 18:52, Martin Jambon a écrit :
>
>> I love this recurrent discussion!
>
> I love your carefully argumented response !
>
>> - I see absolutely no practical advantage of having an immutable
>> "character
>> string" type.
>
> In fact I find the result of the fo
Hi,
I'm wondering if the execution order is defined during class
construction. For example:
let n = ref 0
let next () = incr n; !n
class foo = object
val x = next ()
val y = next ()
val z = next ()
method print = Printf.printf "%d %d %d\n" x y z
end
Will that always give x < y < z or cou
Jacques GARRIGUE writes:
> From: Goswin von Brederlow
>
>> I want to keep a linked list of structures that have a common subset
>> of functionality. I thought this would be a good use of ocaml objects.
>> A base class with the common subset of functionality and methods to
>> link them. And then
| I can agree with you on this argument, but a question still remains:
| why should you ever do things like:
|
| > # s.[0] <- 'a';;
The point is that it might not be your own code that does it, but a
function written by someone else to which you innocently pass a string
argument. You may think you
Hello,
I'm looking for an OCaml-binding (library)
for the libmodbus:
https://launchpad.net/libmodbus
Does someone here know, if there is such a lib?
Ciao,
Oliver
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bi
If my experience is worth anything, I've had hardly any use of mutable
character strings. Many of immutable ones. The practical advantage of
having immutable character strings is the same as that of having
immutable integer data : when you do not need to mutate data of a type,
you'd better keep
> You clearly want both, but each with its own type and strings as immutable.
> Individual character mutability is rarely needed in text processing
I can agree with you on this argument, but a question still remains:
why should you ever do things like:
> # s.[0] <- 'a';;
Regards,
--
Paolo
~
Martin Jambon wrote:
- There is nothing to change in OCaml's string type because it is an "array of
bytes", with type char representing single bytes.
$ ocaml
Objective Caml version 3.10.2
# let c = 'ö';;
Characters 8-9:
let c = 'ö';;
^
Syntax error
#
Meanwhile, in another
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Serge Sivkov wrote:
> I 've look through sources of the netplex. For now i clearly see how
> synchronious service works,
> but i don't understand workflow of anyncronious version of netplex
> services (i'm using ocamlnet-2.2.9).
Can you explain what you're trying
Hello,
I 've look through sources of the netplex. For now i clearly see how
synchronious service works,
but i don't understand workflow of anyncronious version of netplex
services (i'm using ocamlnet-2.2.9). As says manual, to implement
anync version of the processor i must to return control to co
Le 3 avr. 09 à 18:52, Martin Jambon a écrit :
I love this recurrent discussion!
I love your carefully argumented response !
- I see absolutely no practical advantage of having an immutable
"character
string" type.
In fact I find the result of the following sequence of operations very
Daniel Bünzli wrote:
>
> Le 3 avr. 09 à 16:46, Jon Harrop a écrit :
>
>> Just because my OCaml programs were mutating strings and translating
>> that into
>> F# is non-trivial if the string is shared or big. In essence, I've always
>> used OCaml's strings as a more efficient byte array. In fact,
Hello,
Is it possible to generate 32 bits assembly code with a 64 bits ocamlopt?
Thanks,
--
Jean Guyader
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Begin
Am Freitag, den 03.04.2009, 17:19 +0600 schrieb Serge Sivkov:
> Hello,
> I want to convert my synchronious multi process netplex service to
> asynchronous multi thread one.
> I don't understood how can i send data from #receive_message
> to #process for asynchronous worker (ideally more than one p
Le 3 avr. 09 à 16:46, Jon Harrop a écrit :
Just because my OCaml programs were mutating strings and translating
that into
F# is non-trivial if the string is shared or big. In essence, I've
always
used OCaml's strings as a more efficient byte array. In fact, the best
translation to F# is oft
I still don't have an answer for this problem, but I'm wondering now ...
is there a way to create a Labeled ConcreteBidirectional reusing these
building blocks ?
is there an ocamlgraph specific ml ?
:)
p
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Pietro Abate wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I've a sma
On Friday 03 April 2009 15:18:51 Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> > I found immutable strings to be a PITA
>
> in what way?
Just because my OCaml programs were mutating strings and translating that into
F# is non-trivial if the string is shared or big. In essence, I've always
used OCaml's strings as a m
> I found immutable strings to be a PITAin what way?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> I read that batteries included provides first-class rope-based strings and
> I
> was just reading up on some horror stories about immutable strings on
> StackOverflow. This made me wonder
Hello all.
I've a small problem with ocamlgraph.
I want to parse a dot graph into a ConcreteBidirectional.
The problem is that the signature needed for Dot.Parse requires a function
edge, but I've no mean to specify a label (since it is unlabelled !!)...
The functor for ConcreteBidirectional sa
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 13:56, Jon Harrop wrote:
> was just reading up on some horror stories about immutable strings on
> StackOverflow.
Can you post any link?
--
Paolo
~
~
:wq
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.f
I read that batteries included provides first-class rope-based strings and I
was just reading up on some horror stories about immutable strings on
StackOverflow. This made me wonder what people's thoughts are about mutable
vs immutable strings?
I had never thought about it until I started port
Hello,
I want to convert my synchronious multi process netplex service to
asynchronous multi thread one.
I don't understood how can i send data from #receive_message
to #process for asynchronous worker (ideally more than one per thread).
Here is my current code :
class my_hooks =
...
method re
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> Decide on a format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook - check
I have written one open source book, and participated in another, and
DocBook was always a barrier of entrance for most potential
contributors. These days I'd rather go for some
26 matches
Mail list logo
