Is the OCaml runtime Boehm-safe? That is, can it be run with Boehm
turned on and traversing OCaml's heap? (So that the OCaml heap can
provide roots to Boehm.)
I conjecture the answer is yes, although it's hard to tell for sure
without a precise specification of what is/is not OK with the
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 21:05 -0300, Andre Nathan wrote:
If I simplify the rule above to
forall; (; gen = expr; ); var = ipatt; .;
e1 = expr; impl = OPT =; e2 = OPT expr -
then everything after the dot is bound to e1, even when there's a =.
For the archives, this happens because = is a
On 4/2/2009 1:42 PM, Conglun Yao wrote:
Different kinds of error happened, when trying to use it.
Even the ordinary expression: List.length [1; 2;3 ], failed. 'List'
is parsed as module_longident, try to match the rule I defined.
Not sure whether you are still looking for a solution to
Hello list,
I'm please to announce the first public release of Amthing, a multi-threaded
GUI library for OCaml.
Features are:
- Multi-threaded design using Concurrent ML style message passing.
- Time-line animation and functional reactive sprite system.
- X11 Binding.
- 2D vector rendering by
