On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:37, Edgar Friendlythelema...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to think that optcomp is just a mismatch for what I'm
trying to do, and I'm trying to use the wrong tool for the job. That
said, I don't think it's the best solution (especially with already long
compile
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:00:28PM -0400, Edgar Friendly wrote:
Is there a better way to do this? The path I'm following is looking
very byzantine compared to C's [-DFOO] + [#ifdef FOO].
You can just use autoconf's ordinary features:
eg:
AC_ARG_ENABLE([foo],
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:44:52AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Matthew Macy wrote:
I don't anticipate ever doing functional programming professionally
Why ever not?
I'm at a small VC funded startup and I use Ocaml and Haskell
for production code on a regular basis. We have a
Hi,
(1) is there any specialized APIs for processing RDF as well as OWL file?
(2) is there any similar API in Ocaml like XML-parsers from Java world?
Thank you.
Tumee.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
That makes sense. I do quite low level stuff as well, even Linux device
drivers and that is not ever going to be done in Ocaml or Haskell :-).
People do use Haskell in developing OS kernels, and you can't get more
low-level than that:
Florian Hars wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
That makes sense. I do quite low level stuff as well, even Linux device
drivers and that is not ever going to be done in Ocaml or Haskell :-).
People do use Haskell in developing OS kernels, and you can't get more
low-level than that:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:07:23PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Florian Hars wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
That makes sense. I do quite low level stuff as well, even Linux device
drivers and that is not ever going to be done in Ocaml or Haskell :-).
People do use Haskell
