Hi,
Benjamin Ylvisaker wrote:
I have been using ocamlgraph for a while, and have been generally happy
with it. I experienced some poor performance with moderately large
graphs (10-100k vertices) recently, which led me to look through the
source code a little. It seems that doing anything
Christophe Raffalli christophe.raffa...@univ-savoie.fr wrote:
Or, if all major GCs are compacting and the minor heap is at
a higher adress than the major heap, then OCaml's could also
preserve the adress order between GC ...
I do not think that the current minor GC algorithm does
any effort to
On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Julien Signoles wrote:
Benjamin Ylvisaker a écrit :
I have been using ocamlgraph for a while, and have been generally
happy with it. I experienced some poor performance with moderately
large graphs (10-100k vertices) recently, which led me to look
through
