I thought you might be interested to know that my new OCAML App for the iPad
was published
on the iTunes Store yesterday. I believe this is a significant achievement
given the notorious
reluctance of Apple to embrace languages other than C/obj-C/C++ and I would
hope it would
promote wider
Wow! This seems hugely interesting to me.
Actually I've been wondering a while to know if I would buy an ipad,
and my conclusion was only if I can do Ocaml on it.
Can you report a bit more on your experience ?
Which tools did you use? How convenient it is? What drawback did you
encounter?
Hello,
On 09-11-2010, Jonathan Kimmitt jonat...@kimmitt.co.uk wrote:
I thought you might be interested to know that my new OCAML App for the iPad
was published
on the iTunes Store yesterday. I believe this is a significant achievement
given the notorious
reluctance of Apple to embrace
Hi,
Perhaps a further explanation is necessary. What I have done is ported the
interpreter ocamlrun
to the iPad and added a gui based on Graphics.cma and bound ancillary libraries
such as Num.cma
into the executable. The ocaml interpreter itself is written in ocaml and is
identical to the
Hi,
The application itself is written in Xcode. You need to be a member of the
development
program at £59/$99 or equivalent per year to get access to the signing keys if
you need
to modify 'extern' functions (native C code of the interpreter)
You don't need anything apart from iTunes to
Which tools did you use?
There are a few instructions here [1].
Best,
Daniel
[1] http://web.yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tosh/ocaml-on-iphone/
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:07:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Only looked at the pictures so far but they do look good. I'm missing
some screenshots though. How does the interface look like? I assume you
have some way to select a part of the image to zoom?
When clicking with left
Daniel de Rauglaudre daniel.de_rauglau...@inria.fr writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:07:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Only looked at the pictures so far but they do look good. I'm missing
some screenshots though. How does the interface look like? I assume you
have some way
Hi all,
I know this was asked at least 12 years ago[1], but is there any
consensus or reason for there not being a compose function in standard
OCaml, nor an infix operator?
At the moment I tend to let compose or let (-) f g x = f (g x),
but I wish I didn't have to!
Thanks,
Arlen
[1]
This is probably a minority opinion, but I have written and read quite a lot
of OCaml code over the years, and I've seen surprisingly few effective uses
of the composition operator. Somehow, I usually find that code that avoids
it is simpler and easier to read.
I'm not averse to infix operators.
Hi Yaron,
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:45 -0500, Yaron Minsky wrote:
This is probably a minority opinion, but I have written and read quite
a lot of OCaml code over the years, and I've seen surprisingly few
effective uses of the composition operator. Somehow, I usually find
that code that avoids
on 10/11/10 3:45 AM, ymin...@gmail.com wrote:
This is probably a minority opinion, but I have written and read quite a
lot
of OCaml code over the years, and I've seen surprisingly few effective
uses
of the composition operator. Somehow, I usually find that code that
avoids
it is simpler and
12 matches
Mail list logo
