[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-18 Thread Benedikt Meurer
On Nov 17, 2010, at 09:44 , Alain Frisch wrote: > There is actually already a native top-level in the distribution, even though > it is undocumented and unmaintained. You can build it with the "make > ocamlnat" target. The implementation is based on the same approach as native > dynlink. Th

[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 17-11-2010, Alain Frisch wrote: > On 11/16/2010 03:52 PM, Benedikt Meurer wrote: >> OCamlJit 2.0 was specifically designed for desktop processors and is >> not really portable to anything else in its current shape, because >> the target audience are people using the interactive top-level and >>

[Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)

2010-11-17 Thread Satoshi Ogasawara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/11/17, at 17:44, Alain Frisch wrote: > Does performance really matter that much for rapid prototyping/development? > I can imagine other uses of the toplevel where performance matters more, like > theorem provers embedded in the OCaml toplev