On Sunday 20 September 2009 10:08:48 ri...@happyleptic.org wrote:
> > ...why is that program not written with INRIA's Ocaml?
>
> Probably for the same reason than all Princeton university
> programs are not written in SML/NJ (so I guess) ?
INRIA aren't using OCaml because SML/NJ sucks? ;-)
--
Dr
> ...why is that program not written with INRIA's Ocaml?
Probably for the same reason than all Princeton university
programs are not written in SML/NJ (so I guess) ?
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mail
Hi,
There is probably a simple and yet very good reason scilab isn't
written in ocaml. Its predecessor was started in the 80s and scilab
itself was started in 90s[1], I guess that rules out ocaml and caml
which was only 5 years-old at that time. ;-)
Now that doesn't explain why it is moving to ja
Zitat von "Jon Harrop" :
On Saturday 19 September 2009 08:39:14 Stéphane Lescuyer wrote:
> ...and from INRIA's view I would think: they have developed
> OCaml, but do not use it for their own developments
> ... strange, isn't it?
I think you don't quite realize how big an institute the INR
Hi,
Zitat von "Philippe Wang" :
Why not use Bigloo? It's a efficient scheme compiler, also developed
at INRIA.
http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/
[...]
I looked at bigloo before I came to OCaml.
I decided against it.
Not only because of schem's (()(()()))-terror ;-)
bu
Why not use Bigloo? It's a efficient scheme compiler, also developed at INRIA.
http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/
Just kidding,
--
Philippe Wang
m...@philippewang.info
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Saturday 19 September 2009 08:39:14 Stéphane Lescuyer wrote
On Saturday 19 September 2009 08:39:14 Stéphane Lescuyer wrote:
> > ...and from INRIA's view I would think: they have developed
> > OCaml, but do not use it for their own developments
> > ... strange, isn't it?
>
> I think you don't quite realize how big an institute the INRIA is :
>
> http://w
Oliver Bandel wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> the program Scilab, a Matlab-clone,
> written by INRIA, is written in C,
Psilab is Ocaml (plus C and Fortran libraries):
http://psilab.sourceforge.net/
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
> ...and from INRIA's view I would think: they have developed
> OCaml, but do not use it for their own developments
> ... strange, isn't it?
I think you don't quite realize how big an institute the INRIA is :
http://www.inria.fr/inria/enbref.en.html
Plus, there are a variety of other (domain
Hello,
the program Scilab, a Matlab-clone,
written by INRIA, is written in C,
and since version 5.0 is using Java-Stuff for Plotting,
and this stuff is used in a way that it does not really
support Linux...
...why is that program not written with INRIA's
Ocaml?
Maybe rewriting it would make
10 matches
Mail list logo
