Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl and security

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 06:06:26PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: Indeed. The optional seed parameter to Hashtbl.create does exactly this in the new implementation of Hashtbl (the one based on Murmur3). It may be worth noting that Perl solved this problem (back in 2003) by unconditionally using a

[Caml-list] Will the data allocated by caml_alloc be automatically freed by g arbage collector?

Dear All: I am writing a program that include a main loop written in Ocaml and a sub-module written in C. The main loop called the sub-module a lot, and a huge array is returned from each call. So I use the standard C-Caml interface to return these huge data as shown below: extern C

Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl and security

Am Sonntag, den 01.01.2012, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Xavier Leroy: On 01/01/2012 01:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 06:06:26PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: Indeed. The optional seed parameter to Hashtbl.create does exactly this in the new implementation of Hashtbl (the

Re: [Caml-list] Hashtbl and security

On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 10:04:03PM +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: Am Sonntag, den 01.01.2012, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Xavier Leroy: On 01/01/2012 01:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 06:06:26PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: Indeed. The optional seed parameter to