List,
I was wondering if there was any reason not to make let rec the default /
sole option, meaning cases where you clearly don't want a let rec instead
of let (only in functions, not cyclic data).
Diego Olivier
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
Hi Diego.
I think one of the best reason to *not* have let rec as the default is
shadowing.
Say you have a function that expect a string as an argument
let foo s =
and you realize that it's the job of the callee and not the caller to
check that the string is escaped. You can just
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
dofp.oc...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
I was wondering if there was any reason not to make let rec the default /
sole option, meaning cases where you clearly don't want a let rec instead
of let (only in functions, not cyclic data).
On 01/02/2012 04:05 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
dofp.oc...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
I was wondering if there was any reason not to make let rec the default /
sole option, meaning cases where you clearly don't want a let rec
