Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread _why
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up some part in the current docs and write some sort of how-to-switch-to-2.0. And the wiki needs some work too! Yes, we need to clear up the rdoc and write howtos

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread David Gurba
Mongrel ... but then again I think thats so 2005 :/ haha long live camping! On Oct 30, 2008, at 8:01 AM, _why wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up some part in the current docs and write

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Fred Phillips
On Thu Oct 30 15:01:50 2008, _why wrote: I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? I run it with FastCGI on Apache. Some benchmarks between the different servers would be nice. -- Fred O. Phillips http://fophillips.org BBC7 7572 755F 83E0 3209 504A E4F7 874F 1545 9D41

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Eric Mill
I've deployed a couple Camping apps in a FastCGI environment on shared hosting, and written wiki pages on it. I feel like this must be a pretty common scenario, since shared hosting itself is a common scenario. -- Eric On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:01 AM, _why [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Julik Tarkhanov
On Oct 30, 2008, at 4:01 PM, _why wrote: I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? Oh yeah to imagine the scale: I have like 6 apps on FCGI now.___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Aria Stewart
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:01 AM, _why wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Magnus Holm wrote: Documentation is probably what's missing for a release. Both cleaning up some part in the current docs and write some sort of how-to-switch- to-2.0. And the wiki needs some work too!

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread Josh Schairbaum
I normally use either Thin or Passenger. It's a fairly simple setup for both. I think most shared hosting is going the way of Passenger, Dreamhost, for example. I would say that it might be the most common in the next few months. Just one man's opinion, though. Regards, ch0wda On Thu, Oct 30,

Re: Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-30 Thread John Beppu
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:01 AM, _why [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, we need to clear up the rdoc and write howtos for camping with fastcgi, passenger, and other web servers. I don't know, what do most people deploy camping on? I reverse-proxy to mongrel. --beppu

Let's get this done, please :-)

2008-10-27 Thread Magnus Holm
Okey. Today I cherry-picked some commits from zimbatm, Bluebie and my experimental-branch so we can get a bit closer to 2.0: - Making Camping::ARSession work with AR 2.1 - d1db4f3c50815c93e370b696fb5b6c814bd1a7c4http://github.com/judofyr/camping/commit/d1db4f3c50815c93e370b696fb5b6c814bd1a7c4 -