Re: Markaby license issue

Nice! Lets just all use this thing! What say you, everyone? — Jenna Fox On Sunday, 18 December 2011 at 12:47 PM, Steve Klabnik wrote: > A wild project appears: http://krainboltgreene.github.com/dapper-dan/ > ___ > Camping-list mailing list > Campi

Re: Markaby license issue

A wild project appears: http://krainboltgreene.github.com/dapper-dan/ ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Markaby license issue

> We could even have extensions for things like ajax, so you could add onclick > properties with proc values, such that an ajax call back to the server (or > websockets or whatever) lets the server do stuff and mutate the dom or > replace the page entirely. I really like this idea, but don't yo

Re: Markaby license issue

Markaby is kind of bad though. It has problems, like it doesn't cope well with boolean attributes (last I looked anyway), and it's totes out of date with HTML5 and all that. Could we take this opportunity to start a new project, with Markaby compatible syntax (at least optionally) based around m

Markaby license issue

Okay, we might have a slight problem: It doesn't seem that Markaby ever had a specific license. This means that it's currently "Copyright © _why" and we might not have the right to re-distribute (or contribute to) it. So first of all: if you've ever seen a LICENSE/COPYING-file (or something else

Re: Camping.use Before, Rack::File.new('public')

2011/12/16 Bartosz Dziewoński : > I usually just use Rack::Static: > > module App >  use Rack::Static, :urls => ['/static'] > end > > This would serve ./static/jquery.js at > localhost:3301/static/jquery.js, though - with the directory included > in URL - but will also serve files from subdirectori