API documentation good enough?

As you might know, I'm not using Camping on a regular basis, so I'm just wondering if the API documentation (http://camping.rubyforge.org/api.html) is good enough? If not, is it something we can improve by simply updating camping-unbridged.rb? If not, do we rather want something like this?

Wiki vs homepage

Hey guys, Philippe had some interesting points about the website: 1. Keep the home page simple with all content fitting within 1280 x 1024 2. Use a catchy design (need some help here) 3. Accentuate that Camping is about Ruby (maybe also include the ruby logo somewhere) 4. Have a brief note about

Re: using reststop with tilt

Thanks Philippe, it's working great. Has anyone gotten partials to work with Tilt? Dave On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Philippe Monnet r...@monnet-usa.com wrote: I fixed the issue in the basic_render method. At the time I worked on RESTstop I had done the minimum needed to make it work with

Re: Wiki vs homepage

Yeah, I agree that it makes sense to have two sites, one to promote Camping and one to serve as the official reference. And a wiki would be very convenient for that. On 7/8/2010 1:55 PM, Magnus Holm wrote: Hey guys, Philippe had some interesting points about the website: 1. Keep the home

Re: API documentation good enough?

I think the api doc is pretty decent (I have read it many times) and I like the fact that it is easy to keep up-to-date based on the camping-unabridged.rb file. Also the book is a nice way to get started with Camping. We could then add more books based on more advanced topics like for