I don't think there are any 'shoulds', but people writing code
(including markup) which other people might one day need to understand
would be wise to make it comprehensible, and probably therefore in a
recognisable, readable syntax... which I think is the essence of
Markaby and its legacy :-)
DaveE
I think people who want to write HTML in HTML should write HTML in
HTML.
I think people who don't want to write HTML in HTML should write it
in something they prefer.
Just my humble opinion.
--Isak Andersson
Den 2011-12-29 02:14:18 skrev Anthony Durity
<gravi...@jollyrotten.org>:
I think people should write HTML in HTML, CSS in CSS, Javascript in
Javascript, and Ruby in Ruby.
I don't get the fascination with DSLs for existing domains. DSLs
for your
own stuff is okay, where you need something that is more complex
than a
bunch of functions and less complex than a full blown language. But
DSLs
for existing domains. Just write it in the target language already.
If you
want to integrate with other stuff you can. If you want to switch
platforms
you can and you don't have to throw awaw or rewrite a ton of stuff.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Jenna Fox <a...@creativepony.com>
wrote:
I tried to use that crazy stuff recently and it just doesn't work,
in
webkit at least.
—
Jenna
On 20/12/2011, at 4:34 PM, Steve Klabnik <st...@steveklabnik.com>
wrote:
> Yep! Granted, if you serve it with an XML MIME type, it must be
able
> to be parsed with an XML parser, so none of that
>
> <p>
> <b>this <i>is</b> insane</i>
>
> stuff! But still...
>
> I actually like XML. There are some of us in Ruby...
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
