I'd like to see the screencasts on YouTube or Vimeo where everyone can
view them.
That's fine, I can post them to my YouTube channel too. David didn't
really give a restriction on what I could
do with the Videos. :)
DaveE
Cheers!
- Isak Andersson
Seconding Vimeo - it's exactly the sort of creative friendly helpful community
we get along so great with. :)
I wouldn't bother with youtube. The main thing is that people can comment and
embed and vote/like it and all that wonderful stuff. :)
—
Jenna
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 5:28 PM,
Well, why not just go with both? Bigger audience!
The more places the better. Vimeo is a bit better though.
Anyways, about the deployment video. I was thinking I hook an
application up with Unicorn and
putting nginx on top of it. How does that sound?
- Isak Andersson
On 03/30/2012 08:35 AM,
Sounds great - my sites are the same setup, but with regular thin. :)
—
Jenna
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 5:47 PM, Isak Andersson wrote:
Well, why not just go with both? Bigger audience!
The more places the better. Vimeo is a bit better though.
Anyways, about the deployment video. I
Yeah, it's just a matter of preference I guess. I like both but I'm
going with Unicorn :)
Also, I guess I should ask the whole mailing list on this, I created a
little base thing for
presentations when I'm just talking concepts in the screencasts. I took
some assets
from the Camping.io site
I've heard nothing but good myself. The biggest difference is that Slim is a
bit more friendly isn't it?
And what did you think about the image :)
- Isak
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox a...@creativepony.com skrev:
I've certainly heard
This is good but let's use the same font as the website :)
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Comic-Zine-OT
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Isak Andersson icepa...@lavabit.comwrote:
** I've heard nothing but good myself. The biggest difference is that
Slim is a bit more friendly isn't it?
For the deployment video I think you should perhaps start with the standard
configuration which has thin and nginx but of course if you have time you
can do one with Unicorn too. The idea is to make it easy for users to run
without having to install too much extra stuff.
Best Regards
David
On
Quickly while we're on the topic of typefaces:
Our web design makes use of a typeface called Topstitch in the sidebar
navigational menu. The type designer Typodermic donated a license to use this
typeface on our site, but it is a commercial font so should not be used outside
of official
Oh, thin is a standard in Camping? Never noticed.
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
david costa gurugeek...@gmail.com skrev:
For the deployment video I think you should perhaps start with the standard
configuration which has thin and nginx but of
I've never heard of that. Camping is a rack app. It works with any kind of rack
server. Thin is in no way official or standard. Use whatever you think is good!
There are so many ways to deploy ruby apps and nearly all of them are really
great. It's not worth fussing too much over unless you're
For screencasts I recommend whichever of the fashionable web servers has the
coolest looking logo when zoomed out a bit, as it'll look good on video.
Unicorn has a pretty great logo which scales well.
Who ever said ruby severs don't scale?
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 12:55 AM,
So we should use the one in the Camping.io repository? Can I get that in
OpenType?
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox a...@creativepony.com skrev:
Quickly while we're on the topic of typefaces:
Our web design makes use of a typeface called
Hello Jenna,
I totally agree in keeping it consistent hence I think we should use Comic
Zine for the webcast titles etc. Isak will be using that.
I don't think we will be using topstitch for now and I checked the license
is anyway reasonable (30$ on my font) but glad to know you got it free :)
That's what I was suspecting. I'll go with unicorn then. Apparently it handles
more requests/sec than Thin. But that might be old benchmarks who knows.
Not that speed is everything. Stability etc is also important. But whatever.
There shouldn't be too much of a difference in setting them up
They're all really really fast. I like the idea of how unicorn works though -
it sounds quite nice. Apache for legacy stuff only these days. I wonder if
there are any server's with a logo as awesome as LLVM's.
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 1:06 AM, Isak Andersson wrote:
That's what
On 30 Mar 2012, at 14:51, david costa wrote:
Vimeo is great (I use it for a lot of professional videos) but
perhaps we should have them on youtube too because google ranks
video from youtube higher on their searches.
YouTube: loads of trolls (-2) but lots of eyeballs (+1) = total: -1
Disable comments on youtube perhaps?
P.S. RE: 'unicorn sounds nice' for those who haven't heard it yet, this is what
Unicorn sounds like: http://d.pr/olau
—
Jenna
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 1:20 AM, Dave Everitt wrote:
On 30 Mar 2012, at 14:51, david costa wrote:
Vimeo is
Wow. We should really enforce some sort of top or bottom posting policy on this
mailing list. Preferably top because That's the default for most clients
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Jenna Fox a...@creativepony.com skrev:
Disable comments on
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free, simple
camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing the wheel as heroku already supports
camping apps too. So this would be the ground idea:
a) This would be entirely free - no paid plans to
ah - was just stripping out the excess and responding to multiple
parts of multiple messages in email-style. Will revert to adding at
the top - DaveE :-)
Wow. We should really enforce some sort of top or bottom posting
policy on this mailing list. Preferably top because That's the
Having just spent a whole afternoon: updating my sources in Debian
just to install curl just to install rvm and check rvm requirements...
[paused here and logged out of server] to find that I now have to add
my user to the rvm group (to find useradd -G rvm myusername
*fails*)... then
oops - should have put my last reply here... - DaveE
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free,
simple camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing the wheel as heroku already
supports camping apps too. So this would be the
+9 this :)
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
david costa gurugeek...@gmail.com skrev:
Hello all,
I am opening a separate topic just to brainstorm the idea of a free, simple
camping deployment/hosting option.
Now this is not about re-inventing
Dropbox sounds like a great idea, except for if it starts syncing an sqlite db
constantly.
Another good option would be if we can make an nginx config (or a camping app!)
which does WebDAV - finder, explorer, and nautilus all support it, and it means
site upload bits and site serving bits
Here is my progress on the server :)
Spent several hours to try to work on a nginx + passenger setup on the
cloud even using some pre-made ami with no success. It was also fairly slow
vs. a real server (even on an XLarge instance).
So I went back to one spare brand new mac mini server quadcore i7
26 matches
Mail list logo
