Ok I would really like to get the promo site going so that we have
something up and running before Why Day (Aug 19th per
http://whyday.org/). I propose the following:
1. I can go ahead and buy the ruby-camping.com domain - should
someone also buy the .org equivalent? I think the promo site h
I don't know if it's available or not, but why not campingrb.com rather than
ruby-camping.com? Many of the other small web frameworks follow this url
scheme (sinatrarb and padrinorb).
Or maybe not. I just think it's an interesting url for Ruby projects.
Hi Steve - I really like that idea. Of course, someone (us) is going
to have to actually purchase the domain at some point :-) - Dave E
I don't know if it's available or not, but why not campingrb.com
rather than ruby-camping.com? Many of the other small web
frameworks follow this url schem
Hey Magnus, I patched the files and it's still the same thing. Here's
the backtrace, let me know if you want browser dump as well.
127.0.0.1 - - [23/Jul/2010 11:48:39] "GET /Home HTTP/1.1" 500 95353 0.3607
ArgumentError: Anonymous modules have no name to be referenced by
/usr/local/lib/ru
My preference would be to have Ruby explicitly mentioned in the name and
a clear easy-to-read url. This makes it a bit more SEO friendly too
which is important for a promo site. IMHO suffixing with rb is not very
visually attractive.
On 7/23/2010 9:39 AM, Steve Klabnik wrote:
I don't know if i
Anyone know who did this:
http://camping.tumblr.com/
?
Dave E
Jenna: I suggest a tumblr, because it doesn't cost anything, can
have group committers, all the features we need, and it too is
connected to the rich heritage of _why :)
___
Camping-lis
May not be attractive, but if it's already a ruby-related meme, worth
considering - Dave E
On 23 Jul 2010, at 17:38, Philippe Monnet wrote:
My preference would be to have Ruby explicitly mentioned in the
name and a clear easy-to-read url. This makes it a bit more SEO
friendly too which is
Wait, forget about that Tilt patch. Try this instead:
module App
include X
end
// Magnus Holm
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 18:01, David Susco wrote:
> Hey Magnus, I patched the files and it's still the same thing. Here's
> the backtrace, let me know if you want browser dump as well.
>
> 12
lol, at first I thought you were messing with me. X is the apps
Controllers module, correct?
Will I always have to do this when using Tilt? Or only until this
patch makes it into a gem?
Dave
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Magnus Holm wrote:
> Wait, forget about that Tilt patch. Try this inste
You'll have to agree that "include X" sounds so much better than
"include Controllers"? :-)
Could you test one more thing for me? Without a Tilt patch, can you
add `require 'camping/templates'` right after `require 'camping'` and
check if it still works?
Here you go: `gem install camping --source
10 matches
Mail list logo
