2007/9/28, MenTaLguY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps condensing ?
Yes, with a little touch of artistic sense added :)
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Hi Gregor,
I wasn't able to track the error on Camping side, but it comes from
r2r that defines nil.error_missing.
2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
require rubygems
require ruby2ruby
# It works in this case but probably breaks r2r on a larger scale.
class NilClass
undef
2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a
large scale libary IMO.
I'm not sure you understood, it is ruby2ruby who defined
nil.method_missing. We can't start to support each and every hack a
library will add to the Ruby
On 9/27/07, Jonas Pfenniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a
large scale libary IMO.
I'm not sure you understood, it is ruby2ruby who defined
nil.method_missing. We can't start to
On Sep 27, 2007, at 7:35 PM, John Beppu wrote:
^for this reason, you can't really use ruby2ruby in anything
serious. nil.method_missing prevents a lot of exceptions from
being thrown, and there's a lot of code out their that legitimately
needs those exceptions to be thrown for correct
Sorry, if I was misunderstood with saying
Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a
large scale libary IMO.
I was insulting ruby2ruby and not camping. So everthing is okay on this side.
I solved my particular problem with the combination of caming and
ruby2ruby and
6 matches
Mail list logo
