Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
2007/9/28, MenTaLguY [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Perhaps condensing ? Yes, with a little touch of artistic sense added :) Cheers, zimbatm ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
Hi Gregor,
I wasn't able to track the error on Camping side, but it comes from
r2r that defines nil.error_missing.
2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
require rubygems
require ruby2ruby
# It works in this case but probably breaks r2r on a larger scale.
class NilClass
undef method_missing
end
Camping.goes :Test
module Test
module Controllers
class Index R '/'
def get
div.literate_programming! do
example { 1 + 1 == 2 }
end
end
end
end
module Helpers
def example(block)
pre( block.to_ruby.gsub(/^proc \{\n(.*)\n\}$/m, '\1'))
end
end
end
I don't know where the :href attribute comes from and I don't know,
why it only appears within camping and not in markaby itself.
Camping overrides [:href,:action,:src] to translate relative links to
absolute ones. See Mab at the end of camping-unabridged.
--
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a large scale libary IMO. I'm not sure you understood, it is ruby2ruby who defined nil.method_missing. We can't start to support each and every hack a library will add to the Ruby core. -- Cheers, zimbatm ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
On 9/27/07, Jonas Pfenniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/9/27, Gregor Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a large scale libary IMO. I'm not sure you understood, it is ruby2ruby who defined nil.method_missing. We can't start to support each and every hack a library will add to the Ruby core. ^for this reason, you can't really use ruby2ruby in anything serious. nil.method_missing prevents a lot of exceptions from being thrown, and there's a lot of code out their that legitimately needs those exceptions to be thrown for correct behavior. ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
On Sep 27, 2007, at 7:35 PM, John Beppu wrote: ^for this reason, you can't really use ruby2ruby in anything serious. nil.method_missing prevents a lot of exceptions from being thrown, and there's a lot of code out their that legitimately needs those exceptions to be thrown for correct behavior. require 'ruby2ruby' class NilClass undef method_missing end Solved? ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Re: Camping and ruby2ruby
Sorry, if I was misunderstood with saying Defining NilClass#method_missing for nothing is not too clever, for a large scale libary IMO. I was insulting ruby2ruby and not camping. So everthing is okay on this side. I solved my particular problem with the combination of caming and ruby2ruby and will not use it for something serious - just academics. I was looking for help, concerning this issue, found it, thankfully, on this list and will post a blog entry tomorrow, so other probably will find it as well. From my side, everything is okay at this point. Thanks again for the hint. There is nothing I could see, that should be changed inside of caming to allow such a strange of standard behaviour. Cheers, Gregor ___ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
