[Captive-portals] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07

2020-05-03 Thread Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready with Nits https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-capport-api-07.html Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being

Re: [Captive-portals] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-04

2020-05-03 Thread Erik Kline
Perhaps a reference to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3756 as well as the security considerations sections of 2131, 4861, 4862, and 8415. I'm capturing notes in https://github.com/capport-wg/7710bis/issues/30 . On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 17:09, Martin Thomson wrote: > I think that the standard

Re: [Captive-portals] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-04

2020-05-03 Thread Martin Thomson
I think that the standard assumption is that we can equate the ability to send a DHCP response or a RA with control of the network (or at least those aspects of the network upon which clients rely on DHCP/RA for). I don't know if that assumption is written down in a place we could cite it, but