[Captive-portals] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: (with COMMENT)

2020-08-08 Thread Martin Duke via Datatracker
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Captive-portals] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-08-08 Thread Tommy Pauly
Hi Martin, I think the DISCUSS indeed is resolved by the -09 version. The text now says: “At minimum, the API MUST provide the state of captivity. Further, the API MUST be able to provide a URI for the User Portal.” That is in line with what the API document provides. It is *able* to provide

[Captive-portals] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-08-08 Thread Martin Duke via Datatracker
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to ht

[Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09.txt

2020-08-08 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Captive Portal Interaction WG of the IETF. Title : Captive Portal Architecture Authors : Kyle Larose David Dolson