Sorry, no... I missed the date: they would all be on the 4 June
telechat. The last call on the architecture doc won't be finished
before 21 May.
Barry
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the plan.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:16 PM Michael Richardson
Yes, that's the plan.
Barry
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:16 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Barry Leiba wrote:
> > Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
> > documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
> > they are, so the IESG is
Barry Leiba wrote:
> Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
> documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
> they are, so the IESG is reviewing them all together? I think that's
> best, but can be convinced not to have the others
Hey Barry,
I'll upload one shortly. Sorry about the delay.
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 09:18, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Can we get a revised I-D up on this now, so I can get the last call
> started? The last calls on the other two documents are ending this
> week.
>
> Martin, should I hold the telechat
Can we get a revised I-D up on this now, so I can get the last call
started? The last calls on the other two documents are ending this
week.
Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
they are, so the IESG is
Hi,
I was reviewing this AD and found a few discrepancy needing clarifications,
couple of them may just be editorial in nature.
Appreciate your response on this, thanks.
Thanks,
Subash
Page 3
Captive Network and Captive Portal are used interchangeably, so do we define
captive portal or network
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 7:21 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Dave, and I think we're OK to start last call on
> the document after you post a revised I-D with the changes so far --
> most unresolved things are not at a blocking level. Just one thing
> I'd like to push on before
Thanks for the reply, Dave, and I think we're OK to start last call on
the document after you post a revised I-D with the changes so far --
most unresolved things are not at a blocking level. Just one thing
I'd like to push on before you revise the I-D, though:
> > Please be consistent about
Barry,
Thanks for reviewing. I've committed some changes to the repo and opened
some issues too.
Nits fixed in commit
https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/commit/f7de70f8dc71dd3f22e2db4208641d1975278ec0
On 2020-04-24 19:35, Barry Leiba wrote:
Thanks for the work in this document.
Thanks for the work in this document. Here’s my AD review; I think a
revised I-D is needed before we go to last call.
General:
Expect comments during IESG Evaluation about the extensive use of BCP
14 key words in an Informational document. I don’t object to it here,
though I do find all the
10 matches
Mail list logo
