Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Hi Steve, Glad you’re testing is going well so far. > On Jul 7, 2020, at 6:03 AM, Steve Haskew wrote: > > Hi Tommy, > > I have now been doing some testing of our solution with iOS 14 and it has > been fairly straightforward in getting it all working at a basic level! > > I have a couple of

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Hi Tommy, I have now been doing some testing of our solution with iOS 14 and it has been fairly straightforward in getting it all working at a basic level! I have a couple of observations/queries: Just to confirm, are you not yet supporting any of the informational elements (venue info URL,

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

As an individual design decision, I agree... Just that the protocol spec does not attempt at requiring this... Also has deployment issues as each enforcement device now needs the "operator" SSL certificate. On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 1:33 PM Erik Kline wrote: > The enforcement device and the API

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

David, This is a very good observation - and one that we have had to consider in our implementation. The source of the captive status needs to be reliable and quick enough to achieve the flow described in section 6 (Example Interaction): "Once the user satisfies the requirements for external

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Cc: captive-portals Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas Hi David, Tommy, all, Just to add the the discussion, from the perspective of a network operator! We are just implementing and going to be testing this very soon. We don’t see any iss

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Hi David, Tommy, all, Just to add the the discussion, from the perspective of a network operator! We are just implementing and going to be testing this very soon. We don’t see any issues in terms of policy application, because the final step to log the user in will be the same with either

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

> On Jul 2, 2020, at 11:55 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Not really a CAPPORT protocol problem... but... > > Tommy Pauly wrote: >> One point I wanted to clarify: the iOS and macOS betas support for >> CAPPORT discovery and APIs still goes through the standard and existing >> UI flow

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Not really a CAPPORT protocol problem... but... Tommy Pauly wrote: > One point I wanted to clarify: the iOS and macOS betas support for > CAPPORT discovery and APIs still goes through the standard and existing > UI flow for captive portals. The times in which the captive portal UI

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > > +1 > > Out of curiosity, does the implementation handle the 7710bis options' > urn:ietf:params:capport:unrestricted value? That doesn’t yet stop us from sending out the probe, no. That can be something added later, based on how networks

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Tommy, this is great! Thanks for all your work here, it's good to see this turn into something concrete. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, at 07:30, Tommy Pauly wrote: > Hello CAPPORT, > > I wanted to highlight an announcement we’ve made for the betas of iOS > and macOS released today: > > How to

[Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

Hello CAPPORT, I wanted to highlight an announcement we’ve made for the betas of iOS and macOS released today: How to modernize your captive network The betas for iOS and macOS support both draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis and