...@ietf.org>>;
>>> capport-cha...@ietf.org <mailto:capport-cha...@ietf.org>; captive-
>>> port...@ietf.org <mailto:port...@ietf.org>; Martin Thomson
>>> mailto:m...@lowentropy.net>>; draft-ietf-
>>> capport-...@ietf.org <mailto:cappor
.org
>> <mailto:capport-cha...@ietf.org>; captive-
>> port...@ietf.org <mailto:port...@ietf.org>; Martin Thomson
>> mailto:m...@lowentropy.net>>; draft-ietf-
>> capport-...@ietf.org <mailto:capport-...@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Captive-portals]
G ; capport-cha...@ietf.org; captive-
> port...@ietf.org; Martin Thomson ; draft-ietf-
> capport-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-
> capport-api-07: (with DISCUSS)
>
> Just jumping in here, apologies if I don't have all
Just jumping in here, apologies if I don't have all context:
> On 11 Jun 2020, at 11:38 pm, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> First of all what is the intention of which HTTP version should be supported
> here? And which protocol are the port 443 you are recommending, TCP, UDP or
>
Your suggested rewording works for me, modulo one question:
Might it be better to say, "SHOULD use the default https port", rather
than giving the port number here? Or perhaps, if you really want to
say "443", make it, "SHOULD use the default https port, 443."
Barry
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:12
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 6:38 AM, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-capport-api-07: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and
Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-api-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
