Re: [Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > Over the years on this list we have seen many use-cases come > through, I recall: > - A school/library network that allows most of the Internet, > but captures and redirects for certain networks / sites > - A network allows all

Re: [Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Bird wrote: >> I'd say that the amount of information provided here is rich enough >> that you want to talk to a human. Very few networks permit sending of >> arbitrary packets to arbitrary hosts and the receipt of similar. The >> point

Re: [Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

> On Feb 5, 2018, at 4:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:41 AM, David Bird wrote: >>> I have heard UE vendors express a strong desire to be able to know >>> about status before they attempt to use the network. >>> >> >> Hm,

Re: [Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:41 AM, David Bird wrote: >> I have heard UE vendors express a strong desire to be able to know >> about status before they attempt to use the network. >> > > Hm, but (assuming you are using the provided network for DNS, CRL checks, > and the API itself),

Re: [Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:03 AM, David Bird wrote: > Thanks Darshak and Tommy, this is really helpful. Yes, thank you both. > Some comments: > > In 2. Workflow: Does it make sense to reorder 2) and 3)? It would seem > 'Enforcement' should come before determining status (of said

[Captive-portals] I-D Action: draft-ietf-capport-api-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Captive Portal Interaction WG of the IETF. Title : Captive Portal API Authors : Tommy Pauly Darshak Thakore