Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-05 Thread Asela Pathberiya
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Deependra Ariyadewa d...@wso2.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote: It seems the Cassandra version that you are using tightly couple into the an older version of the thrift. In that case we will have to maintain

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-05 Thread Paul Fremantle
Are we not using OSGi for these dependencies? Its meant to solve these sort of problems! Paul On 5 March 2012 07:17, Deependra Ariyadewa d...@wso2.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote: It seems the Cassandra version that you are using tightly

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-05 Thread Afkham Azeez
Yes, it means that people have not specified the correct package import export versions. The different versions of these OSGi bundles can coexist. Can we fix these import-export versions at least for these bundles? On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote: Are we not

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-05 Thread Tharindu Mathew
Asela, could you check whether you can fix the problem without removing the jar? We will have to maintain two versions if two components have version specific dependencies... On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote: Yes, it means that people have not specified the

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-05 Thread Asela Pathberiya
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote: Asela, could you check whether you can fix the problem without removing the jar? We will have to maintain two versions if two components have version specific dependencies... Yes will look. As Azeez mentioned, There

[Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Deependra Ariyadewa
Hi All, I need to upgrade following dependencies in Carbon trunk to support Cassandra 1.x.x. concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru version 1.1 to 1.2 high-scale-lib version 1.0 to 1.1.2 antlr version 2.7.7 to 3.2 Also I need to add following dependency to trunk. jamm version 0.2.5 There is a dependency

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Rajika Kumarasiri
There is a dependency mismatch when I try to start Cassandra in Carbon core with libthrift 0.8.0 ( carbon trunk libthrift version) but it works fine with libthrift 0.6.1. Please advice me how to resolve this issue and let me know if you have any concern regarding above version changes.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Deep, I'd suggest that we stabilize build first, do this change, and do a complete build to ensure nothing breaks, and then commit, lest this would potentially introduce more instability. There was an offline discussion with Azeez et al on the same $subject. Thanks, Senaka. On Mon, Mar 5,

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Deependra Ariyadewa
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote: There is a dependency mismatch when I try to start Cassandra in Carbon core with libthrift 0.8.0 ( carbon trunk libthrift version) but it works fine with libthrift 0.6.1. Please advice me how to resolve this issue and

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Rajika Kumarasiri
It seems the Cassandra version that you are using tightly couple into the an older version of the thrift. In that case we will have to maintain both. Rajika On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Deependra Ariyadewa d...@wso2.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon trunk Cassandra 1.x.x upgrade

2012-03-04 Thread Deependra Ariyadewa
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote: It seems the Cassandra version that you are using tightly couple into the an older version of the thrift. In that case we will have to maintain both. I checked Cassandra next version 1.1.x series and it depends on