Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-03 Thread Thilina Buddhika
For the next release, we need to go with Rampart trunk or with a new release from the trunk as WSS4J 1.6 migration work is happening in the trunk. Thanks, Thilina On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-03 Thread Afkham Azeez
-1 on moving to trunks until we get a series of successful Bamboo builds. We need a stable foundation to stand on first, before we do any drastic changes. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Samisa, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe

[Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Thilina Buddhika
Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we are sticking with the released versions of 3.2.0. Moving to Apache trunks requires some changes in certain Carbon components, for example moving to Neethi 3.0 requires some changes in rampart-* orbit bundles, caching and throttling modules.

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we are sticking with the released versions of 3.2.0. Moving to Apache trunks requires some changes in certain Carbon components, for example moving to Neethi 3.0

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Nuwan Bandara
+1, We have already pointed shindig to the apache trunk, since we need OS 2.0 updates. Regards, /Nuwan On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ?

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Pradeep Fernando
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote: +1, We have already pointed shindig to the apache trunk, since we need OS 2.0 updates. +1 Regards, /Nuwan On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM,

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we are sticking with the released versions of 3.2.0. Moving to Apache trunks requires some changes in certain Carbon components, for example moving to Neethi 3.0

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we are sticking with the released versions of 3.2.0. Moving to Apache trunks requires some

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
Hi Samisa, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.comwrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
I am not a fan of using Apache trunks. The problem with using Apache trunks is that, we will have longer cycles to release from our trunk. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Samisa, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
+1. We can safely move to Synapse trunk as all the fixes/features available in 2.1.0-wso2v4/5 are already included in the Synapse trunk. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote: +1, We have

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Sameera Jayasoma
+1. Lets update the Carbon version in the trunk to 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT also. Thanks, Sameera. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Folks, How about the $subject ? At the moment, we are sticking with the released versions of 3.2.0. Moving to Apache

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Why do we need Apache trunks? Why cannot we live with a release Apache projects? We are adding double trouble if we depend on bleeding Apache trunks. This is similar to having a stable Carbon core and depend the products/features on a stable core. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pradeep

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote: Why do we need Apache trunks? Why cannot we live with a release Apache projects? IMO, it's because most of apache releases are not very frequent and the fixes are available in the trunks only. For instance in the

Re: [Carbon-dev] Moving back to Apache trunks

2012-01-02 Thread Hiranya Jayathilaka
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote: Why do we need Apache trunks? Why cannot we live with a release Apache projects? We are adding double trouble if we depend on bleeding Apache trunks. This is similar to having a stable Carbon core and depend the