David, Thanks - it is much clearer to me now.
Terry ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:00 AM Subject: caret-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6 > Send caret-users mailing list submissions to > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of caret-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Re: caret-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 3 (David Van Essen) > 2. Caret crash on windows (Johannes Klein) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:58:57 -0600 > From: David Van Essen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [caret-users] Re: caret-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 3 > To: "Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users" > <caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Terry, > > On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Terry Sewards wrote: > > > .... In their description of the cytoarchitectonic map of area 2 > > Grefkes et al. (2001) show area 2 occupying the rostral bank of the > > postcentral sulcus, not extending into the fundus or caudal bank, > > but in the > > probabilistic maps area 2 appears to occupy - in addition to the > > rostral > > bank - a large sector of the fundus and caudal bank. Is this > > entirely due > > to the fact that the location of the postcentral sulcus is variable in > > individual human subjects? > > YES. This spread is evident in their own representations (their Fig. > 7) and in our PALS maps, whether you look in the volume or the surface. > > > (but if this were the case, then a probabilistic > > map of area AIP would presumably overlap considerably with the area > > 2 map). > > > Yes indeed. While we don't have data for AIP to confirm the point, > we do have it for their area 1, which overlaps extensively with area > 2. Ditto for many other pairs of adjacent architectonic areas (e.g., > areas 44 and 45 illustrated in the PALS paper). > > IF surface reconstructions were available to reconstruct the > individual hemispheres for these particular cases, then it would be > possible to use surface-based registration to align the individuals > to the PALS atlas. I can pretty much guarantee you in that case that > there would be much less spread of a surface-based probabilistic area > 2 into the fundus and caudal bank of the PoCes. However, the MRI's > from these individuals were not good enough to get good surface > reconstructions, so for the time being we have to live with the > greater variability imposed by volume-based registration when making > use of the excellent Zilles-lab architectonic maps. > > David > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:04:52 +0000 > From: Johannes Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [caret-users] Caret crash on windows > To: "Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users" > <caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed > > Hi Donna, hi John, > The most current release for windows I could find in John's download > directory crashes when reconstructing surfaces from a segmentation. I > noticed that it's quite a bit older than the current linux/mac versions > - any chance of getting an updated executable for Windows? > Thanks, > Johannes > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > caret-users mailing list > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu > http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > > > End of caret-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6 > ****************************************** > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.5/256 - Release Date: 2/10/2006 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.5/256 - Release Date: 2/10/2006
