Re: [caret-users] nifti images

2006-11-15 Thread Mateus Joffily

Hi John,

Thank you very much. The image looks good to me. I use Linux and Windows 
(preference for Linux).
Just one more question: How does Caret deals with the negative 'x' voxel 
size set by SPM5? Does it affect the way Caret displays the image? In 
the 'Volume Attributes Editor'  dialog - 'Resample' tab, the voxel size 
is always positive.


thanks,
Mateus

John Harwell wrote:


Hi Mateus,

I think I have the problem corrected and here is how 3D_original.nii  
appears in Caret.  If the images look good to you let me know which  
operating system you are using and I will make an update available  
for you to download.  This problem only occurred if the X-axis was  
not left/right, the Y-axis was not posterior/anterior, or the Z-axis  
not inferior/superior.



--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 13, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi John,

I uploaded four files in Caret, their names are:

1) 3D_original.nii : original volume that doesn't display correctly  
in Caret (case 1 described in my previous message)

2) 3D_original_spm5.pdf : capture of 3D_original.nii display in spm5
1) 3D_resliced.nii : same original volume but resliced (case 2  
described in my previous message)

1) 3D_resliced_spm5.pdf : capture of 3D_resliced.nii display in spm5

Thank you very much.

Mateus


John Harwell wrote:


Hi Mateus,

Can you upload the nifti volume that is not displayed correctly  in  
Caret at http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi;.   Also, 
can  you capture and upload an image of the volume displayed  
correctly in  SPM5 so that I know how it should appear.


After uploading the files, please email me the names of the  
files.   It may be a few days before I can look into this problem.


--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 10, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi,

I am having some trouble to load nifti images with caret5. The   
problem is the following:


1) When I try to load an image that has a rotation specified in  
the  header, Caret seems not to apply it properly. The displayed  
image  shows a strange orientation and the voxels size is wrong.


2) However, when the same image is resliced and no rotation is   
specified in its header, Caret displays the image correctly, the   
voxels size are correct and the image origin is also correctly   
located.


Those same images, (1) and (2), are both correctly displayed  with  
SPM5.


The images extension is .nii, so I don't think this should be a   
problem related to image format interpretation (like  interpreting  
nifti images as analyze and ignoring part of the  header information).


Does anyone else has experienced this problem?  Thanks for your  help.

Mateus
___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users




___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users





___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
 





Re: [caret-users] nifti images

2006-11-15 Thread John Harwell

Mateus,

To download updated versions of Caret:

1) Go to the website http://brainmap.wustl.edu/pub/john/;.  Use the  
username pub and the password download to access the web site.
2) Download the file caret5_exe_linux.zip or caret5_exe_windows.zip  
which contain the linux and windows versions of the caret5 executable.


To install:

1) Go into your Caret installation's bin directory and backup  
(rename) your current caret5 executable.
2) Place the downloaded file in the Caret installation's bin  
directory and unzip the downloaded file which will produce either  
caret5 or caret5.exe.  You might have to change the permissions on  
linux using the command chmod a+rx caret5.



As for the negative x voxel size, this usually means the the origin  
is specified on the right side of the volume and that the voxels are  
ordered right-to-left.  When Caret reads a volume and the volume  
contains valid orientation information, Caret flips the volume in  
memory to place the volume in an LPI (-x=left, -y=posterior, - 
z=inferior) orientation.  Visit the website http:// 
www.grahamwideman.com/gw/brain/orientation/orientterms.htm for more  
information.


--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 15, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi John,

Thank you very much. The image looks good to me. I use Linux and  
Windows (preference for Linux).
Just one more question: How does Caret deals with the negative 'x'  
voxel size set by SPM5? Does it affect the way Caret displays the  
image? In the 'Volume Attributes Editor'  dialog - 'Resample' tab,  
the voxel size is always positive.


thanks,
Mateus

John Harwell wrote:

Hi Mateus,

I think I have the problem corrected and here is how  
3D_original.nii  appears in Caret.  If the images look good to you  
let me know which  operating system you are using and I will make  
an update available  for you to download.  This problem only  
occurred if the X-axis was  not left/right, the Y-axis was not  
posterior/anterior, or the Z-axis  not inferior/superior.



--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 13, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi John,

I uploaded four files in Caret, their names are:

1) 3D_original.nii : original volume that doesn't display  
correctly  in Caret (case 1 described in my previous message)

2) 3D_original_spm5.pdf : capture of 3D_original.nii display in spm5
1) 3D_resliced.nii : same original volume but resliced (case 2   
described in my previous message)

1) 3D_resliced_spm5.pdf : capture of 3D_resliced.nii display in spm5

Thank you very much.

Mateus


John Harwell wrote:


Hi Mateus,

Can you upload the nifti volume that is not displayed correctly   
in  Caret at http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi;.
Also, can  you capture and upload an image of the volume  
displayed  correctly in  SPM5 so that I know how it should appear.


After uploading the files, please email me the names of the   
files.   It may be a few days before I can look into this problem.


--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 10, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi,

I am having some trouble to load nifti images with caret5.  
The   problem is the following:


1) When I try to load an image that has a rotation specified  
in  the  header, Caret seems not to apply it properly. The  
displayed  image  shows a strange orientation and the voxels  
size is wrong.


2) However, when the same image is resliced and no rotation  
is   specified in its header, Caret displays the image  
correctly, the   voxels size are correct and the image origin  
is also correctly   located.


Those same images, (1) and (2), are both correctly displayed   
with  SPM5.


The images extension is .nii, so I don't think this should be  
a   problem related to image format interpretation (like   
interpreting  nifti images as analyze and ignoring part of the   
header information).


Does anyone else has experienced this problem?  Thanks for  
your  help.


Mateus
___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



___ caret-users  
mailing 

Re: [caret-users] nifti images

2006-11-15 Thread Donna Dierker

Hi Mateus,

See inline replies below.

On 11/14/2006 09:45 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:

Hi Donna,

Thanks for your help. I am sending you two histograms of 3D_resliced.nii:
(1) histogram_resliced_1.jpg is the same histogram you already sent to 
me;
(2) histogram_resliced_2.jpg is the histogram of 3D_resliced.nii after 
resampling at 1x1x1mm with Caret.


We can see that the spikes disapear in (2). It looks like much closer 
to the histograms described in your 'Peak Tweaking' document. As I 
don't have much experience with image segmentation, I was wondering if 
there was any problem with my images. I am glad to know that they look 
fine for you.
Try segmenting both inputs using Caret and compare the results.  You 
don't have to patch the resulting hemispheres to get a good feel for the 
quality; just looking at the fiducial surfaces and segmentations is 
generally adequate for judging which input is better, and if the 
differences matter.  An unacceptably blurred structural MRI will have a 
smooth histogram, but probably won't produce a good segmentation.  In 
both histograms, I could detect peaks, so there's probably adequate 
GM/WM contrast to get a good segmentation.
May be the problem is the one pointed by Simon. If this is the case, 
adjusting the histogram bins could minimize the effect. Do we have 
control over the histogram bins with Caret interface?
It doesn't look like it; the only inputs are the voxdims.  To be honest, 
I rarely use Caret to resample my volumes.  I usually do this as part of 
a preprocessing protocol using AFNI, FSL, or SPM utilities.  They allow 
one to specify interpolation mode, etc.  (At wustl.edu, this is done 
when the volume is written to 711-2B space using Avi Snyder's imgreg and 
related utilities.)


Thanks,
Mateus



Dierker wrote:


Hi Mateus,

I can't address your original problem with the NIfTI 
orientation/rotation, but I did have a look at your volumes, and this 
statement confuses me:


The histogram of my images (3D_original.nii and 3D_resliced.nii) 
shows several noisy sharp peaks. 


The attached captures show the histograms of 3D_original.nii 
(histogram_orig.jpg) and 3D_resliced.nii (histogram_resliced.jpg).  
The original has smoother looking peaks, but both have discernible 
gray and white matter peaks.  Neither look particularly bothersome.


Could you be more clear about what concerns you?

On 11/13/2006 05:43 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


John,

May I profit from the fact that I have already uploaded my images to 
ask you one more question about them? The histogram of my images 
(3D_original.nii and 3D_resliced.nii) shows several noisy sharp 
peaks. Do you know what do they mean? I know that, if I reslice the 
3D_resliced.nii to 1x1x1mm voxels size with Caret, they disappear. 
Thanks.


Mateus

John Harwell wrote:


Hi Mateus,

Can you upload the nifti volume that is not displayed correctly in  
Caret at http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi;.  Also, 
can  you capture and upload an image of the volume displayed 
correctly in  SPM5 so that I know how it should appear.


After uploading the files, please email me the names of the 
files.   It may be a few days before I can look into this problem.


--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Nov 10, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Mateus Joffily wrote:


Hi,

I am having some trouble to load nifti images with caret5. The  
problem is the following:


1) When I try to load an image that has a rotation specified in 
the  header, Caret seems not to apply it properly. The displayed 
image  shows a strange orientation and the voxels size is wrong.


2) However, when the same image is resliced and no rotation is  
specified in its header, Caret displays the image correctly, the  
voxels size are correct and the image origin is also correctly  
located.


Those same images, (1) and (2), are both correctly displayed with  
SPM5.


The images extension is .nii, so I don't think this should be a  
problem related to image format interpretation (like interpreting  
nifti images as analyze and ignoring part of the header information).


Does anyone else has experienced this problem?  Thanks for your help.

Mateus
___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users




___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users