Re: [caret-users] Macaque Segmentation

2006-03-31 Thread Donna Dierker

Hi Eric,

Based on what you describe, you probably have some non-uniformity in 
your volume that bias correction may help.  I use FSL's fast for this 
purpose (which uses BET as preprocessing), but there are many other 
options (e.g., MNI's nu_correct and AFNI's 3dUniformize).  You can 
upload your volume here and I can either confirm or rule out this issue:


http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi

Peak tweaking makes a huge difference in segmentation quality.  This 
page might be helpful:


http://brainvis.wustl.edu/help/peak_tweaking/

If you're getting good results out of Freesurfer, then you can use the 
resulting surface in Caret (e.g., for registration, visualization, or 
other purposes).  Except in cases where the quality of the structural 
MRI is exceptionally poor (e.g., acquisition resolution way to low; 
non-uniformity beyond hope -- like the surface coil scans I used to 
see), then bias correction and peak tweaking usually give good results 
in Caret.


On 03/31/2006 11:03 AM, Faden, Eric (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:


I have tried two different approaches thus far and neither seems to yield 
reasonable results.  I first tried to feed in the full scan in ACPC coords.  
The image was rotated in brains, converted to AFNI, and then imported to caret. 
 It is correctly oriented and looks ok although the contrast seems a bit off 
(some of the image seems to white).  After cutting the brain into just the left 
hemi I ran it through the segmentation process which yielded a pretty bad 
surface that still included about 90% of the eyes and a very large chunk of the 
skull.  I then decided to try it with just a brain image (as I already had a 
brain mask in brains).  Following the same steps as the first attempt with the 
brain only image also yielded a fairly bad initial surface as well as leaving a 
large block of the hindbrain.  Are there any other tricks people could provide? 
 Is there a trick to picking the gray/white matter peaks?  For reference I have 
run the same image through a modified freesurfer surface generation which works 
fairly well, but was curious to see if caret could top it.

-Eric
 




___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
 




--
Donna L. Dierker
(Formerly Donna Hanlon; no change in marital status -- see 
http://home.att.net/~donna.hanlon for details.)





[caret-users] Macaque Segmentation

2006-03-29 Thread Faden, Eric (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Hey All,

Are there any special steps required outside of the standard tutorial for 
segmenting a Macaque brain?  Or would the normal tutorial work correctly if 
followed?

-Eric Faden



RE: [caret-users] Macaque Segmentation + AC/PC Align

2006-03-29 Thread Faden, Eric (NIH/NIMH) [F]
I actually resampled them at .5mm already.  The other problem I am having is 
that the way our monkeys are scanned they need to be rotated to the correct 
orientation (45 degrees or so).  I tried to use the AC/PC align in Volume 
Attributes Editor.  I selected the AC and PC then clicked align.  After about 
10 minutes I got a white cube where my volume used to be.  Any thoughts on what 
this is? or what is a good way to AC/PC align my volume?

-Eric


-Original Message-
From: Donna Dierker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/29/2006 10:58 AM
To: Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users
Subject: Re: [caret-users] Macaque Segmentation
 
The only difference that comes to mind is the voxdims.  Resampling your 
macaque structural to cubic 0.5mm rather than cubic 1.0mm tends to work 
best (although I've seen 0.75mm work well).  You definitely do NOT want 
to resample to cubic 1.0mm for monkeys.

On 03/29/2006 09:53 AM, Faden, Eric (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:

Hey All,

Are there any special steps required outside of the standard tutorial for 
segmenting a Macaque brain?  Or would the normal tutorial work correctly if 
followed?

-Eric Faden

___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

  

-- 
Donna L. Dierker
(Formerly Donna Hanlon; no change in marital status -- see 
http://home.att.net/~donna.hanlon for details.)

___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

winmail.dat

Re: [caret-users] Macaque Segmentation + AC/PC Align

2006-03-29 Thread John Harwell

Eric,

The AC/PC align in volume attributes is something I recently added  
but has received only limited testing (I tried it on two volumes).  I  
believe AFNI (afni.nimh.nih.gov) can AC-PC align a volume so you  
might try AFNI or another volume type program.


Good luck.

--
John Harwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
314-362-3467

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Washington University School of Medicine
660 S. Euclid Ave.Box 8108
St. Louis, MO 63110   USA

On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Faden, Eric ((NIH/NIMH)) [F] wrote:

I actually resampled them at .5mm already.  The other problem I am  
having is that the way our monkeys are scanned they need to be  
rotated to the correct orientation (45 degrees or so).  I tried to  
use the AC/PC align in Volume Attributes Editor.  I selected the AC  
and PC then clicked align.  After about 10 minutes I got a white  
cube where my volume used to be.  Any thoughts on what this is? or  
what is a good way to AC/PC align my volume?


-Eric


-Original Message-
From: Donna Dierker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/29/2006 10:58 AM
To: Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users
Subject: Re: [caret-users] Macaque Segmentation

The only difference that comes to mind is the voxdims.  Resampling  
your
macaque structural to cubic 0.5mm rather than cubic 1.0mm tends to  
work
best (although I've seen 0.75mm work well).  You definitely do NOT  
want

to resample to cubic 1.0mm for monkeys.

On 03/29/2006 09:53 AM, Faden, Eric (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:


Hey All,

Are there any special steps required outside of the standard  
tutorial for segmenting a Macaque brain?  Or would the normal  
tutorial work correctly if followed?


-Eric Faden

___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users




--
Donna L. Dierker
(Formerly Donna Hanlon; no change in marital status -- see http:// 
home.att.net/~donna.hanlon for details.)


___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

winmail.dat
___
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users