Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread 'Richard Frovarp' via CAS Community
If they have a public metadata file you can put the URL in the metadata configuration element instead of the static file. CAS will download and cache the metadata file on some sort of updating schedule ( I don't remember the specifics), but it will help ensure you have updated metadata. On

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
Scratch that. I needed an updated metadata file. Now I can authenticate and get forwarded to the sp. Then I get an error there. I may not be registered in their system. Waiting on a response from them. Thanks!!! This has been very helpful! Keith Alston Regent University IT Department

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
Hmmm, metadata expired. So I changed the expire date in the metadata. Now I'm getting this: RootCasException(code=UNSATISFIED_SAML_REQUEST) at

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
Yes, zoom is in production. minitab in my dev environment. Both 5.3.14. pretty much the exact same setup. Keith Alston Regent University IT Department keit...@regent.edu 757.619.3421 From: cas-user@apereo.org on behalf of Ray Bon Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Ray Bon
Keith, The destination URLs are different, cas and casdev. Is minitab routing to cas or casdev and is your service defined there? Ray On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 17:26 +, Keith Alston (Staff) wrote: Notice: This message was sent from outside the University of Victoria email system. Please be

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread 'Richard Frovarp' via CAS Community
You are probably going to need to take a look in the CAS logs. It seems that it should match, but the logs should tell you exactly what it is searching for. It will also tell you if there was an error loading the service file when it first tried to update it. On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 17:26 +,

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
I take that back. Zoom works and it does a post request. saml-tracer show this. Zoom works, minitab doesnt. minitab request--- https://casdev.regent.edu/cas/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO; >

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
Looks like my post URL is: https://casdev.regent.edu/cas/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO I guess the get url has redirect in it?? Keith Alston Regent University IT Department keit...@regent.edu 757.619.3421 From: 'Richard Frovarp' via CAS Community Sent: Monday,

Re: [cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread 'Richard Frovarp' via CAS Community
Since I saw someone create the URL by hand the other day, I'm going to ask the simple question: is the request hitting the HTTP-POST binding location? POST and Redirect are two different URLs in CAS (and I'm guessing most IdPs). I've never had to do anything different to handle the two

[cas-user] SAML2 request POST vs GET CAS 5.3.14??

2021-04-19 Thread Keith Alston (Staff)
It seems that my CAS SAML2.0 idp is handling SAML2 services that do GET requests just fine. But when I have an SP that does a SAML2 POST request my idp is not reading the parameters and I get the "Application Not Authorized to Use CAS" message instead of the auth page. Difference being

[cas-user] Re: Cas overlay ver 6.3.x integration with pure RADIUS (not MFA RADIUS)

2021-04-19 Thread artur miś
I have changed cas.propierties to : cas.authn.radius.server.nasPortId=-1 cas.authn.radius.server.nasRealPort=-1 cas.authn.radius.server.protocol=EAP_MSCHAPv2 cas.authn.radius.server.retries=3 cas.authn.radius.server.nasPortType=-1 cas.authn.radius.server.nasPort=-1

Re: [cas-user] User limit of inotify instances reached or too many open files

2021-04-19 Thread Robert
Thanks for the great hint. That helps a lot. The core question for the CAS devs stays: Where does that leak come from? I mean, FileWatcherService and PathWatcherService seem to be straight forward. jephte.clain schrieb am Sonntag, 18. April 2021 um 17:06:48 UTC+2: > hello, > > we noticed that

[cas-user] RE: Endpoint security behind a proxy

2021-04-19 Thread King, Robert
Just in case, anyone else runs into this…. Only tested for our specific use case, running your own Tomcat server version 9.x instead of using the embedded. The issue ended up being Tomcat requires a remote IP valve to handle client IPs behind a proxy. Added the following valve to the tomcat