Re: [cas-user] Re: AUP and X509 authentication

2018-09-25 Thread Curtis Ruck
While that looks like it would address the issue, i believe I will wait as my copy+paste'd solution works now. I really dislike the arbitrary nature of CAS now, while the xml wasn't easy/fun, i definitely think we've gone backwards now. On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 11:51:48 PM UTC-4,

Re: [cas-user] Re: AUP and X509 authentication

2018-09-24 Thread Colin Wilkinson
Hi, I had to do something similar for the Password Management and did not want to recreate everything. So the solution I came up with was to remove the passwordManagementWebflowConfigurer from the execution plan and set the order to one before my configurer and readd the

Re: [cas-user] Re: AUP and X509 authentication

2018-09-24 Thread Andy Ng
Hi Curtis, Ah I missed to mention something, when you tries to override a Bean inside a Configuration file, whether or not is actually override success depends on the load sequence. Which one load last will be the actual bean to be used. See:

Re: [cas-user] Re: AUP and X509 authentication

2018-09-24 Thread Curtis Ruck
That is what i tried initially, but the transition from success to create tgt was still happening. It wasn't until i removed it the , that i could stop that transition, and instead send it to aup. I believe the reason I couldn't just provide my own x509WebflowConfigurer bean in loo of the