Re: [cas-user] Memcache Ticket Registry HA

2018-04-10 Thread Teddy Brown
We perform regular monthly server updates, occasionally more as needed. If we had ticket replication (which Memcached itself doesn't support) we could do these updates during regular working hours and users wouldn't notice. Doing maintenance off hours is an option, and how we do it for

Re: [cas-user] Memcache Ticket Registry HA

2018-04-10 Thread Teddy Brown
That looks very promising! We've been using memcached for some time as a cache but this is the first time I've ever looked for a replicated model. Thank you! On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:05:26 PM UTC-4, Julien Gribonvald wrote: > > Hi, > > You can use repcached for the replicated side

Re: [cas-user] Memcache Ticket Registry HA

2018-04-10 Thread Julien Gribonvald
Hi, You can use repcached for the replicated side with memcached, we are using it since several years in our context and we are totally satisfied ! Thanks Le 10/04/2018 à 17:51, Ray Bon a écrit : Teddy, I have not used memcached. To accomplish your goal you would need a replicated cache.

Re: [cas-user] Memcache Ticket Registry HA

2018-04-10 Thread Ray Bon
Teddy, I have not used memcached. To accomplish your goal you would need a replicated cache. How often do you plan to restart your servers? Will your users to notice? Ray On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:07 -0700, Teddy Brown wrote: Is it possible to get High Availability with the memcache ticket

[cas-user] Memcache Ticket Registry HA

2018-04-10 Thread Teddy Brown
Is it possible to get High Availability with the memcache ticket registry? I only have these attributes configured currently and it works. However it seems if the Memcached instance on either host is restarted (or the host is restarted) that CAS continues to function as expected, any