For one or even a small number of ROACH2s, there probably isn't much advantage
to netboot. As the number of boards in the system increases, netboot helps
because everything runs the same version always. Also, with the kernel and
root filesystem on an SSD, netboot is less prone to
Well done, Morag and team! That is a great catch and very helpful to me and
others!
Kind regards,
Adam
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:43 PM Morag Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I had a quick look in the mail archive and didn't see anything on this,
> but it's not impossible others will come
Hey all,
I had a quick look in the mail archive and didn't see anything on this, but
it's not impossible others will come across/have come across the same issue
I've encountered, so figured I'd potentially save some people future
frustrations and heart attacks.
There's an issue with later
Hi，
Thank you for your reply. I am a novice in this field, and I do not quite
understand what you said. I will analyze and study this issue again.
Best
Wang
Michael D'Cruze 于 2022年6月9日周四
下午6:11写道：
> Hello,
>
> I think nfs/netboot made sense when filesystem updates were being released
> for
Hello,
I think nfs/netboot made sense when filesystem updates were being released for
R2, but I don't really understand why anyone would use it anymore. Roach2
should soloboot by default, and unless you've compiled and are running a custom
filesystem for some reason I'm not sure why any other
Hi Marc，
[image: rpcinfo-p.png]
Thank you very much !
BW
Wang
在2022年6月9日星期四 UTC+8 17:14:47 写道：
>
>
> Hi
>
> It could be that NFS isn't registered with the portmapper, or the
> portmapper isn't running.
>
> $ rpcinfo -p localhost
>
> should normally print a list of services available. If they
Hi Michael，
I'm using ROACH2.I don't know much about other boot methods of ROACH2. My
tutor suggests that I use Netboot.
I spent a lot of time on netboot, the first time I used Ubuntu16, and this
error occurred at netboot：
[image: 154620_8cc3a188_10952828.webp]
I am currently trying to use
7 matches
Mail list logo
