Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future

+1 from Digg -Chris On Feb 17, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > We're looking at branching 0.6 today and starting 0.7 work. > > 0.6 shaped up to be a really nice follow-up to 0.5, where we improved > just about everything while keeping the upgrade path super easy. (We > changed the ne

Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:26 PM, David Strauss wrote: > How dependent are the 0.8 high-level queries on the 0.7 internal changes? It will definitely be affected by the String -> byte[] change with everything else. It also may benefit from being able to have more levels of subcolumns than the 1 w

Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future

On 2010-02-17 21:32, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > So what I'd like to propose is making 0.7 primarily about the > internals changes and push for high-level queries in 0.8, where both > of those hit our usual ~3 month release cycle. I don't think it makes > sense to do those the other way around; introd

Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future

On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:32 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > So what I'd like to propose is making 0.7 primarily about the > internals changes and push for high-level queries in 0.8, where both > of those hit our usual ~3 month release cycle. I don't think it makes > sense to do those the other way

Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > We're looking at branching 0.6 today and starting 0.7 work. > > 0.6 shaped up to be a really nice follow-up to 0.5, where we improved > just about everything while keeping the upgrade path super easy.  (We > changed the network around again,

0.6, 0.7, and the future

We're looking at branching 0.6 today and starting 0.7 work. 0.6 shaped up to be a really nice follow-up to 0.5, where we improved just about everything while keeping the upgrade path super easy. (We changed the network around again, but no disk changes, so it's just going to be shutdown-and-resta

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra #358

See -- [...truncated 1049 lines...] [junit] Cobertura: Loaded information on 685 classes. [junit] Cobertura: Saved information on 685 classes. [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.cassandra.db.R

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra #357

See

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra #356

See Changes: [eevans] pass args onto main class from cassandra-cli.bat Patch by Mark Wolfe; reviewed by eevans for CASSANDRA-797 [gdusbabek] merge from 0.5 [gdusbabek] merge from 0.5 [eevans] quiet stderr log output introduced