gossip documentation

2009-12-04 Thread Jaakko
Hi, Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed or suitable? Any other comments/ideas are of course also very welcome! -Jaakko

Re: gossip documentation

2009-12-04 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureGossip On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jaakko rosvopaalli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed or suitable

Re: gossip documentation

2009-12-04 Thread Jaakko
Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureGossip Ah, yes, Thank You. Sorry about forgetting the URL :( -J

Re: gossip documentation

2009-12-04 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Some of it is pretty low-level -- we might be better served moving some into comments / docstrings and keeping the wiki oriented towards overview. What do you think? On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jaakko rosvopaalli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before