+1.
Jun
IBM Almaden Research Center
K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
jun...@almaden.ibm.com
Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote on 10/12/2009 12:32:27 PM:
[image removed]
[RE-VOTE] Release 0.4.1
Eric Evans
to:
cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
10/12/2009 12:31 PM
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
+1
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since
we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.1
0.4.1 artifacts:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.1
0.4.1
+1
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since
we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
SVN Tag:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:32 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again (as r824462).
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since
we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
+1
--
Eric Evans
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we? :)
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Michael Greene
michael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1] since we
released 0.4.0, it feels about time for an 0.4.1.
Shall we?
+1, release looks good.
(I mentioned on IRC, in the future, just burn a version if something
is wrong with it -- version numbers are cheap, no harm if it was 0.4.2
instead)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com wrote:
Ok, sorry for the false start, here it is again
+1
On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Michael Greene
michael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com
wrote:
The 0.4 branch has received a number of important bug fixes[1]
since we
13 matches
Mail list logo
