RE: OOM Exception

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Burruss
sorry, thought i included everything ;) however, i am using beta2 From: Jonathan Ellis [jbel...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 3:18 PM To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM Exception What version are you using? 0.5

RE: OOM Exception

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Burruss
To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM Exception sorry, i meant the system.log the 2nd time (clear it out before replaying so it's not confused w/ other info, pls) On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Brian Burruss bburr...@real.com wrote: is this what you want? they are big - i'd rather

RE: OOM Exception

2009-12-13 Thread Brian Burruss
another OOM exception. the only thing interesting about my testing is that there are 2 servers, RF=2, W=1, R=1 ... there is 248G of data on each server. I have -Xmx3G assigned to each server 2009-12-12 22:04:37,436 ERROR [pool-1-thread-309] [Cassandra.java:734] Internal error processing get

Re: OOM Exception

2009-12-13 Thread Dan Di Spaltro
What consistencyLevel are you inserting the elements? If you do ./bin/nodeprobe -host localhost tpstats on each machine do you see one metric that has a lot of pending items? On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Brian Burruss bburr...@real.com wrote: another OOM exception. the only thing

Re: OOM Exception

2009-12-13 Thread Stu Hood
PS: If this turns out to actually be the problem, I'll open a ticket for it. Thanks, Stu -Original Message- From: Stu Hood stuart.h...@rackspace.com Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 12:28pm To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM Exception With 248G per box, you probably

Re: OOM Exception

2009-12-13 Thread gabriele renzi
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Stu Hood stuart.h...@rackspace.com wrote: With 248G per box, you probably have slightly more than 1/2 billion items? One current implementation detail in Cassandra is that it loads 128th of the index into memory for faster lookups. This means you might have

RE: OOM Exception

2009-12-13 Thread Brian Burruss
] Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 12:47 PM To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM Exception On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:20 PM, gabriele renzi rff@gmail.com wrote: Is there a reason for having this as an hardcoded value instead of configuration value? Just that nobody has needed

OOM Exception

2009-12-12 Thread Brian Burruss
this happened after cassandra was running for a couple of days. I have -Xmx3G on JVM. is there any other info you need so this makes sense? thx! 2009-12-11 21:38:37,216 ERROR [HINTED-HANDOFF-POOL:1] [DebuggableThreadPoolExecutor.java:157] Error in ThreadPoolExecutor