The singleton requirement might be a problem for us as well, but I
suppose we could set the requirements ourselves.
Basically, we need:
- Mutually dependent services
- A MVP pattern, where the view and presenter are also mutually
dependent, and cannot be singletons.
Tried it with Selenium by following
http://danbunea.blogspot.com/2007/01/test-first-web-applications-tdding.html
and found out that you better put mSelenium.Start() into [SetUp]
instead of [SetUpFixture]. Else every test after the first one will
fail with sessionId should not be null; has this
There is o singeton reqirement
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Chucara chuc...@gmail.com wrote:
The singleton requirement might be a problem for us as well, but I
suppose we could set the requirements ourselves.
Basically, we need:
- Mutually dependent services
- A MVP pattern, where the
Okay, I lied. Here is the AR config:
activerecord default-lazy=true
config
add key=connection.driver_class
value=NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver /
add key=dialect value=NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2005Dialect /
add key=connection.provider
Castle trunk has three concrete implementations of IThreadScopeInfo:
ThreadScopeInfo, WebThreadScopeInfo and HybridThreadScopeInfo. I assume
that because I do not have isWeb=²true² I am using the ThreadScopeInfo.
Should I add isWeb=²true², and do you think that will solve it? Do I need
to write
I think that you need to write one that will use the WCF call context to
keep the session
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Tim Scott tsc...@lunaversesoftware.comwrote:
Castle trunk has three concrete implementations of IThreadScopeInfo:
ThreadScopeInfo, WebThreadScopeInfo and
Hi, what is the best way to use the PaginationHelper with large
resultsets (houndreds of thousands of objects)?
The examples I saw used FindAll() with doesn't seems very efficient
unless some king of lazy loading is made to load the all page in one
query, is lazy loading + batch fetching the way
What is the current cache support for the trunk version?
I saw somewhere that there were (or considering to) changes on the
Cache facility or the cache system.
Also the Caching Support page is not available in the documentation,
where is documentation available about the cache mechanisms, how
I am trying to integrate the geneva framework into the WCF Facility. I
have successfully created a custom channel builder and this is being
called correctly. As geneva attached the client claims set to the
channel we need the channels (i.e. proxies) to be transient. I have,
however found an issue
SlicedFindAll?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, rjlopes rjlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, what is the best way to use the PaginationHelper with large
resultsets (houndreds of thousands of objects)?
The examples I saw used FindAll() with doesn't seems very efficient
unless some king of lazy
For what project?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:48 AM, rjlopes rjlo...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the current cache support for the trunk version?
I saw somewhere that there were (or considering to) changes on the
Cache facility or the cache system.
Also the Caching Support page is not
Does sound like a bug. I'll look at it.
thanks,
craig
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Will A willalderso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I am trying to integrate the geneva framework into the WCF Facility. I
have successfully created a custom channel builder and this is being
called correctly. As
Should be fixed on trunk.
Any interest in contributing the Geneva adapters to the WCF Integration
Faclity?
thanks,
craig
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Will A willalderso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I am trying to integrate the geneva framework into the WCF Facility. I
have successfully
What do I do when I run the executable in WCFTestFacility?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Robert M. robertcmir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Any hints related to my problem?
R.
On Jan 28, 12:21 am, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
Found it
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:19 PM,
Because if you are also using WCF, the HTTP context is not ensured.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, hammett hamm...@gmail.com wrote:
Why? IsWeb=true should be enough.. albeit I dont see how transactions
will be involved in thread switches..
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Ayende Rahien
I saw that about compatibility mode. More about it here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa702682.aspx
Is there a down side to that, assuming I will always to use HTTP and
host in IIS?
On Jan 28, 2:03 pm, Eric Hauser ewhau...@gmail.com wrote:
It is if you run in compatibility mode:
On 7 Jan 2009, at 10:37, Loic Nageleisen wrote:
Hello everyone,
Coming from a django and cakephp background, I was recently interested
in mono and C#. I was looking for a good framework like the
aforementioned, with agile capabilities, notably scaffolding. The
Castle Project was an
Component.ForIMyService().ImplementedByMyService()
.ActsAs(new DefaultServiceModel());
Check out
http://svn.castleproject.org:8080/svn/castle/trunk/Facilities/Wcf/Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Tests/ServiceHostFixture.cs
--- CanCreateServiceHostAndOpenHostFromConfiguration
On Jan 28, 5:17
AddBaseAddresss is used for relative addressing so not sure why you see
different results with it.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Robert M. robertcmir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
Great... after adding .AddBaseAddresses(http://localhost:9001/SMS/
service.svc) it started and it works.
So, MonoRail.
http://hammett.castleproject.org/?p=226
More http://hammett.castleproject.org/?s=monorail+cache
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Ricardo Lopes rjlo...@gmail.com wrote:
for Actions and ViewComponents.
2009/1/28 hammett hamm...@gmail.com
For what project?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009
Craig -- I think the service was working fine without the base
address. I was able to hit the URL fine without it (nothing returned
because it was a GET, but it worked). It is required for the metadata
behavior to work. Haven't really dug into why.
On Jan 28, 6:32 pm, Craig Neuwirt
That's what I saw too.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Eric Hauser ewhau...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig -- I think the service was working fine without the base
address. I was able to hit the URL fine without it (nothing returned
because it was a GET, but it worked). It is required for the
I hate to post about databinder stuff, but this seems odd.
What is the expected behaviour binding to a params dictionary like:
params[obj.SomeList[0]]=123
params[obj.SomeList[1]]=456
params[obj.SomeList[2]]=
params[obj.SomeList[3]]=
I swear DataBinder used to add 2 items to obj.SomeList
23 matches
Mail list logo
