This look like it should work, please create a test case that demonstrate
the problem
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Mike Nichols <nichols.mik...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I have looked around and can't figure this out. I am trying to
> configure this :
> public class DefaultCreateMaterialsTestCommand<T, TFactory> :
> IDefaultCreateMaterialsTestCommand<T, TFactory>
> {
> public DefaultCreateMaterialsTestCommand(ISampleRepository
> sampleRepository,IPersist<T>
> testRepository,IMaterialsTestBuilder<TFactory> testBuilder)
> {
> <snip>
>
>
> --every dependency in this ctor resolves on its own.
> --But this fails:
> kernel.Resolve<IDefaultCreateMaterialsTestCommand<MyClass,MyFactory>>
> ();
>
> It complains that there are services waiting to be registered, but is
> blank.
> The only slightly exotic thing I have is this..note that the generic
> parameter is the service passed into the ctor:
>
> public class MaterialsTestBuilder<T> : IMaterialsTestBuilder<T> {
> public MaterialsTestBuilderBuilder(T testFactory) {
>
> /* etc*/
> }
>
> I am not sure what I am doing wrong here. Is it illegal to use the
> service type of an generic parameter as the type of ctor dependency in
> the same object?
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
