Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-30 Thread Richard Jones
I've set the wheels in motion. I just need a little help from the pydotorg volunteers (and some hits from the mailman cluebat). Richard On 30 March 2013 06:43, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver wrote: >> If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that >> 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just >> switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane /

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-29 Thread Donald Stufft
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones wrote: >> On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver wrote: >>> If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that >>> 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list j

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-29 Thread Richard Jones
On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver wrote: > If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that > 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just > switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane / etc.) stay valid, but > the list goes into moderated mode.

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/28/2013 05:57 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tres Seaver > wrote: > >> On 03/28/2013 04:32 PM, PJ Eby wrote: >>> I really don't see any gains for renaming the list. It's not like >>> we can go and scrub the entire

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 28, 2013, at 02:22 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >Is there much point in keeping catalog-sig and distutils-sig separate? Without yet reading the whole thread, I'll just mention that it's probably easier to just retire one or the other mailing lists and divert all discussion to the other one. O

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Dennis Coldwell
> But whatever, I hate the pointless duplication and just want to kill the overlap. Agree, +1 to merging into one list. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 7:28 PM, PJ Eby wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss > wrote: > >>

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Alex Clark
On 2013-03-28 21:57:11 +, Donald Stufft said: On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Signed PGP part On 03/28/2013 04:32 PM, PJ Eby wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby wrote: Can we do it by just dropping catalog-

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Donald Stufft
On Mar 28, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > Signed PGP part > On 03/28/2013 04:32 PM, PJ Eby wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Donald Stufft > > wrote: > >> On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby wrote: > >>> Can we do it by just dropping catalog-sig and keeping > >>> distutils-si

Re: [Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

2013-03-28 Thread Richard Jones
I think I'm the only one on the list who probably would have objected but I'm on both now so whatever :-) Richard On 29 March 2013 07:32, PJ Eby wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >> On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby wrote: >>> Can we do it by just dropping c