[Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
Thanks to Donald Stufft for his implementation of the PEP 438 changes, I've made them live on testpypi.python.org - specifically the urls page of package administration. Please poke and play. Richard ___ Catalog-SIG mailing list

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 19:26, Richard Jones wrote: Thanks to Donald Stufft for his implementation of the PEP 438 changes, I've made them live on testpypi.python.org - specifically the urls page of package administration. Please poke and play. Nice... first tests: * Going to urls and then clicking on

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 20:31, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Other things: - * Would it be possible to add a link to the corresponding /simple/ index page on the package menu (the one with files, urls, etc.) ? * Could you add a link to the PKG-INFO file from pypi?:action=display_pkginfo to

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20 March 2013 12:31, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: On 20.03.2013 19:26, Richard Jones wrote: Thanks to Donald Stufft for his implementation of the PEP 438 changes, I've made them live on testpypi.python.org - specifically the urls page of package administration. Please poke and play.

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 21:16, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 12:31, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: * Will there be an RPC interface to register URLs with PyPI ? Doing this manually for a large number of files is, well, not ideal :-) It's just a HTTP POST and there's plans for a tool.

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20 March 2013 13:27, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: On 20.03.2013 21:16, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 12:31, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: * Will there be an RPC interface to register URLs with PyPI ? Doing this manually for a large number of files is, well, not

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20 March 2013 14:56, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: Could you change The URL must end with the MD5 hash of the file contents to The URL must include the MD5 hash of the file contents ? (See my original test report for the reason :-)) Hm. The wording was passed by one of the pip

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 23:01, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 14:56, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: Could you change The URL must end with the MD5 hash of the file contents to The URL must include the MD5 hash of the file contents ? (See my original test report for the reason :-)) Hm.

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20 March 2013 15:01, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 March 2013 14:56, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: Could you change The URL must end with the MD5 hash of the file contents to The URL must include the MD5 hash of the file contents ? (See my original test report

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 23:19, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 15:01, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 March 2013 14:56, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: Could you change The URL must end with the MD5 hash of the file contents to The URL must include the MD5 hash of the file

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On 20 March 2013 14:17, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 March 2013 13:27, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: On 20.03.2013 21:16, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 12:31, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: * Will there be an RPC interface to register URLs with PyPI ?

Re: [Catalog-sig] PEP 438 implementation on testpypi

2013-03-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 20.03.2013 23:28, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 14:17, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 March 2013 13:27, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: On 20.03.2013 21:16, Richard Jones wrote: On 20 March 2013 12:31, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: * Will there be an

[Catalog-sig] Replacement client for pep381client

2013-03-20 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, as you might be aware, I've done my share on bitching about my mirror (f.pypi.python.org) breaking. I have picked pep381client apart yesterday and rebuilt it - mostly from ground up. You can find a working version here: https://bitbucket.org/ctheune/bandersnatch The focus has been on

[Catalog-sig] Updated PEP 438

2013-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
I've pushed the latest PEP to the repos. It has all the recent clarifications and the API docs. Just need to wait for the website to rebuild or something. Unless there's any last-minute problems I'll accept the PEP in this form and push the implementation to the production PyPI next week after I

Re: [Catalog-sig] ResponseNotReady error while trying to do fresh sync

2013-03-20 Thread Christian Theune
On 2013-03-14 04:17:35 +, Qijiang Fan said: Hello, I'm maintaining e.pypi.python.org (with Aron Xu). We met some issues on our network attached storage, so we decided to do a fresh sync of pypi. We met an issue while doing that, If you're interested: check out bandersnatch. I just had it

Re: [Catalog-sig] Replacement client for pep381client

2013-03-20 Thread Christian Theune
On 2013-03-20 23:59:21 +, Christian Theune said: I'm currently re-initializing my own mirror. This basically can be run in-place by just removing the existing state data and calling my sync script (bsn-mirror) instead of pep381run with the same parameters. This worked nicely for me -